Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
first weeks after any conflict. PJHQ had also assumed that DFID would be responsible
for providing humanitarian assistance. Dr Brewer’s letter of 24 February to Mr Bowen
suggested that DFID believed that the most effective way to distribute humanitarian
assistance was through IOs and NGOs, and that they would focus their resources
on areas of greatest need (rather than necessarily on the UK’s AO). PJHQ estimated
that between £30m and £50m a month for two months would be required to cover the
provision of humanitarian assistance in the UK AO in the immediate aftermath of any
conflict.
773.  Ms Short informed Mr Blair that, without resources greater than her
department’s entire contingency reserve, “it would be impossible for DFID to take
a leading role in humanitarian delivery in the South-East” of Iraq.
774.  Ms Short held a meeting with DFID officials to discuss Iraq, and in particular the
legality of “reconstruction work” without a covering UN mandate, on 5 March.335 Ms Short
concluded that without a clear mandate for reconstruction, DFID could only legally fund
or undertake humanitarian work. The meeting agreed that:
“… under circumstances where DFID would be involved in humanitarian work
only, DFID’s contingency reserve could be drawn upon. This might provide around
£60‑65m. In the event that a wider DFID role was possible, should we be asked by
No.10 or others how much funding DFID would need, we should mention an initial
sum of £100m.”
775.  Ms Short also agreed the need to:
“… move away from any expectation that DFID would undertake an ‘exemplary’
role, or … focus exclusively on any one area. This decision was taken on the basis
that there would be substantial need elsewhere in Iraq other than simply in the
South East; that the extent of our involvement would not be clear for some time,
as the different variables affecting it fell into place; and that we needed to avoid
being so closely associated with one area that we were seen as the ‘donor of last
resort’, for all unfunded needs. However, we should make clear that, given the right
UN mandate and authority, we would aim to work alongside the UK military, as well
as elsewhere, with others, as appropriate.”
776.  Ms Short said that she would use Mr Blair’s meeting on 6 March to press him to:
examine carefully the legality of different post-conflict options for the UK;
press the US on the need for “sufficient preparation” before any conflict began;
and
consider options for extending the deadline before the vote on a Security
Council resolution or putting forward a revised text.
335 Minute Bewes to Fernie, 6 March 2003, ‘Iraq update: 5 March’.
449
Previous page | Contents | Next page