Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
the US “and appears gradually to be getting through”. He suggested that in any reply
to Mr Haynes’s letter, the Attorney General “might refer briefly to this matter, and to our
wish to remain in close contact on legal issues”.
673.  On 27 February, DFID officials had sought Ms Short’s guidance on “the scope
of DFID co-operation with UK (and potentially other) military forces in support of UK
government objectives in a complex humanitarian emergency”.297 Officials explained
that the approach adopted in Kosovo and developed in Afghanistan, but not universally
accepted as good practice in DFID, provided for:
UK and/or allied military forces to assist vulnerable populations directly when
there was insufficient humanitarian capacity to meet their needs;
funding of military QIPs “which contribute to the security and stability of
the environment thus facilitating humanitarian, recovery and development
programmes and enabling legitimate political developments to take root”;
secondment of humanitarian specialists to UK military forces; and
“the flexibility to decide … the degree of co-operation with combatant military
forces whose operation may, or may not, be endorsed by the UN”.
674.  Ms Short replied: “Thanks – I am minded to maintain our position. We must check
if [there are] any legal implications.”298
675.  On 28 February, a junior DFID official advised:
“I cannot see any International Development Act problems here. Section 3 of the
Act … says: ‘The SofS [Secretary of State] may provide any person or body with
assistance for the purpose of alleviating the effects of a natural or man-made
disaster or other emergency on the population of one or more countries outside
the UK’.
“… [W]hich pretty much allows you to do what you like, so long as it is for the
purpose of alleviating the effects of a disaster or emergency on the population of a
country outside the UK.
“This is understood as applying pretty much to the immediate effects of an
emergency, and not to long term rehabilitation or development … Once you move
into development assistance you must be motivated by poverty reduction. But
you can still use soldiers to provide assistance if that is the best way of reducing
poverty.”299
297 Minute DFID [junior official] to PS/Secretary of State [DFID], 27 February 2003, ‘Civil Military Relations
in Complex Emergencies – DFID Position’.
298 Manuscript comment Short, 27 February 2003, on Minute DFID [junior official] to PS/Secretary of State
[DFID], 27 February 2003, ‘Civil Military Relations in Complex Emergencies – DFID Position’.
299 Email [DFID junior official] to Mosselmans, 28 February 2003, ‘Civil Military Relations in Complex
Emergencies – DFID Position’.
431
Previous page | Contents | Next page