Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Sir Michael Wood, the FCO Legal Adviser from 1999 to 2006, explained in his second
witness statement:
“While some changes to the legislative and administrative structure may be
permissible if they are necessary for public order and safety, more wide-reaching
reforms of governmental and administrative structures are not lawful. That includes
the imposition of major economic reforms.”291
668.  Mr Straw commented on Mr Wood’s advice on 1 March:
“This is good advice: having UN authority for post-conflict Occupation makes sense
politically as well as legally. I’d be happy to receive further advice from Michael
Wood, or talk to him, about whether I should lobby C Powell on progress.”292
669.  Mr Simon McDonald, Mr Straw’s Principal Private Secretary, sent those comments
to Mr Wood on 4 March, after Mr Straw had spoken to Secretary Powell.293
670.  Mr Straw told the Inquiry:
“I was clear that under international law … we would be bound by the 1907 Hague
Regulations as well as the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. We would therefore
be considered an Occupying Power with responsibility for providing ‘public order
and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the
country’. We would need specific UNSCR authorisation for powers and duties
beyond these instruments.”294
671.  Ms Cathy Adams, Legal Counsellor in the Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers,
told Mr Wood on 28 February that the Attorney General had received a letter from
Mr William Haynes, General Counsel at DoD, which, among other issues, dealt with
post-conflict questions.295 Ms Adams advised:
“We have not seen here any papers relating to post-conflict planning. I expect the
Attorney [General] would be interested to know how matters are progressing on this
issue particularly as regards outstanding legal concerns.”
672.  Mr Wood replied on 10 March, the same day as Sir David Manning sent Dr Rice a
UK draft of a possible third resolution. Sir Michael explained that a good deal of thought
had been given to the issue in the FCO and MOD.296 The UK view had been urged on
291 Statement, 15 January 2010, pages 2 and 3.
292 Manuscript comment Straw, 1 March 2003, on Minute Wood to McDonald, 28 February 2003, ‘Iraq
Post-Conflict’.
293 Minute McDonald to Wood, 4 March 2003, ‘Iraq Post-Conflict’.
294 Statement, 19 January 2011, page 18.
295 Letter Adams to Wood, 28 February 2003, ‘Letter from General Counsel of the US Department of
Defence [sic]’.
296 Letter Wood to Adams, 10 March 2003, ‘Letter from General Counsel of the US Department of
Defence [sic]’.
430
Previous page | Contents | Next page