Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
517.  A revised draft was prepared, but not shared with the US.221
518.  UK/US discussion of the post-conflict financing of Iraqi reconstruction is described
in Sections 10.1 and 10.2.
The post-conflict Rock Drill
519.  The stated aim of the UK delegation to the US inter-agency Rock Drill on
21 and 22 February was to encourage the US to draw the conclusion that the job
of administering Iraq was too large for the US, that a large Coalition was the key
to success, and that this could only be achieved by securing UN authorisation for
Phase IV.
520.  Instead, the Rock Drill only confirmed the scale of the shortcomings in US
post-conflict planning, including the deficiencies of ORHA, and the continuing gap
between UK and US positions on the role of the UN.
521.  Sectorisation remained unresolved after the Rock Drill.
522.  On 19 February, the Chiefs of Staff discussed post-conflict planning in the
context of the forthcoming US Rock Drill, an inter-agency rehearsal for post-conflict
administration convened by Lt Gen Garner and scheduled for 21 and 22 February.222
The FCO (Mr Ehrman), the Cabinet Office (Mr Bowen), SIS, Maj Gen Cross and, for
the first time, DFID (Dr Brewer) and the IPU (Mr Chilcott) were present.
523.  Lt Gen Reith reported that Mr Blair wanted:
“… an exemplary aftermath but [was] not committed to any particular size of UK
AOR pending further advice on objectives, capability and capacity to sustain. It was
… unclear who the US anticipated placing as sector leaders given that few other
nations would be able to support the task within three months. Therefore, there may
be an unsupportable expectation that the UK would control a relatively large area.
Pragmatically, however, aftermath operations would commence locally whenever
and wherever hostilities ceased, not necessarily coincident with any plan.
“The FCO view was that other nations should be involved as soon as possible and
that early commitment to any nascent US sector plan should be avoided …
“The UK line to take at the Rock Drill would be the commitment in principle to the
immediate involvement in aftermath ops but not yet to any long-term plan, noting the
PM’s wish to exert maximum influence in aftermath planning. Clarity was needed on
the proposed command chain in Phase IV and whose political and legal authority
would prevail.”
221 Manuscript comments Manning and Drummond on Email Heywood to Banerji, Manning, Powell and
Adonis, 3 March 2003, ‘Financing the Reconstruction of Iraq’ attaching Paper [unattributed], ‘Financing the
Reconstruction of Iraq’.
222 Minutes, 19 February 2003, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
401
Previous page | Contents | Next page