Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
military presence in Iraq post-conflict mandated by the UN would no longer be an
occupying power regulated by the Hague and Geneva Conventions.”
215.  Mr Michael Wood, the FCO Legal Adviser, sent a copy of Mr Grainger’s paper
to Mr Straw on 28 February.
Parliamentary discussion of post-conflict issues, 3 February 2003
216.  In Parliament on 3 February, Mr Blair offered “absolute assurances” that the
UK would deal with any humanitarian consequences of conflict and undertook to
“try to ensure that we move in to help get Iraq back on its feet”.
217.  Mr Mandelson asked Mr Blair about preparations for recovery and reconstruction
in the House of Commons on 3 February:
“In addition to the need for political transition, the humanitarian and refugee
demands could be immense. Will he outline to the House what preparation is
being made for that at the United Nations and by key members of the international
community? What structure for reconstruction is being put in place? In terms of
donor funding, will Britain join America – and, I think Switzerland and Canada – in
making an early offer of resources for those purposes?”106
218.  Mr Blair replied:
“… we must deal with those vital points. We are in discussion with allies and the
United Nations about reconstruction. The Foreign Secretary and I have spoken
to the Secretary-General of the United Nations about that. If there is a conflict
and Saddam’s regime is removed, it is important to give absolute assurances
and undertakings to the people of Iraq that we shall deal with any humanitarian
consequences. In such circumstances, we must also try to ensure that we move
in to help get Iraq back on its feet as quickly as possible. This country is willing
to play its part in that with others.”
219.  In answer to a question from Mr Tony Baldry (Conservative) about the extent of
discussions taking place with UN agencies, Mr Blair replied that detailed discussions
were under way and that: “We are well aware that we must have a humanitarian plan
that is every bit as viable and well worked out as a military plan.”107
220.  Sir Christopher Meyer told the Inquiry:
“… the worry at the time, was that there would be some kind of humanitarian
disaster … What just disappeared from the calculations was the understanding that,
after Saddam was toppled, you were going to have to maintain law and order and
106 House of Commons, Official Report, 3 February 2003, column 28.
107 House of Commons, Official Report, 3 February 2003, column 36.
348
Previous page | Contents | Next page