Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
co-operation with the military. CMOC and DART recruitment was under way. The US
was co-ordinating closely with the UN and NGOs, had funded the UN High Commission
for Refugees (UNHCR) to pre-position emergency assistance and expected the World
Food Programme (WFP) to be a significant partner in the delivery of food.
19.  The Embassy also reported that US officials had envisaged that the post-conflict
talks in Washington on 22 January would focus on emergency relief and reconstruction,
before accepting a UK and Australian suggestion that they also address future political
structures for Iraq.6
20.  The record of a restricted meeting of the cross-Whitehall Ad Hoc Group on Iraq
(AHGI) on 14 January stated that the UK and Australia were being given full access
to US aftermath planning.7 The MOD had established a team at the Permanent Joint
Headquarters (PJHQ) to examine aftermath issues. Relevant departments would be
involved in the team’s planning and the MOD would pass papers to the Cabinet Office
for wider distribution. The record stated, however, that “without a higher level political
and legal framework, MOD planning cannot advance very far”.
21.  On 14 January Mr Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary-General, announced publicly
that the UN had begun humanitarian contingency planning for Iraq.
22.  In response to a question at a press conference on 14 January about the
humanitarian consequences of war, Mr Annan stated:
“We have been doing some contingency planning on that and we are extremely
worried about the fallout and consequences of any such military action. Obviously
we do not want to be caught unprepared. So we have gone ahead and made
contingency plans, and we are in touch with governments that can provide some
financial assistance for us to move our preparations to the next level. But we are
worried.”8
23.  On 22 January, Mr Straw approved the briefing prepared for the UK delegation
to the US/UK/Australia inter-agency talks in Washington.
24.  The briefing material focused on unresolved differences between the UK and
US on the wider post-conflict role of the UN.
25.  It envisaged the Coalition military handing over to an interim, civilian
administration operating under UN auspices, “as soon as practically possible”.
6 Telegram 44 Washington to FCO London, 13 January 2003, ‘US/IRAQ: Day After Humanitarian Planning’.
7 Minute Dodd to Manning, 15 January 2003, ‘Iraq’.
8 UN News Centre, 14 January 2003, Secretary-General’s press conference.
311
Previous page | Contents | Next page