Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.4  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, mid-2001 to January 2003
1113.  Maj Gen Wilson told the Inquiry:
“General Franks was very clear about the criticality of … Phase IV [and] understood
the need to have the resources available and the need for security and the
relationship between reconstruction, humanitarian assistance, disposable funds
and … civil action.”540
1114.  In Cabinet on 16 January, Mr Blair listed priorities for the immediate future:
“preparatory work” on post-conflict planning and the role of the UN;
the need to communicate to the Iraqi people a vision of a better life; and
contingency work on the unexpected consequences of conflict.
1115.  The Cabinet discussed Iraq on 16 January. The discussion is also addressed in
Sections 3.6 and 6.2 .541
1116.  Ms Short said that work on post-conflict issues needed to be taken forward
urgently. She emphasised the need for extra resources, the potential effect of CBW on
civilians and the importance of involving the UN.
1117.  Summarising the discussion, Mr Blair said that the “priorities for the immediate
future were:
improved communications, which would set out the Government’s strategy and
be promoted by the whole Cabinet;
preparatory work on planning the aftermath of any military action and the role of
the United Nations in that, which should in turn be conveyed to the Iraqi people
so that they had a vision of a better life in prospect; and
contingency work on the unintended consequences which could arise from
the Iraqi use of weapons of mass destruction, environmental catastrophe or
internecine strife within Iraq.”
1118.  Despite Mr Blair’s promise that military options would be discussed and the
imminence of the formal decision to offer a significant land contribution, Cabinet
was not briefed on the substance of the military options or the circumstances in
which force would be used. It did not discuss the strategic implications of making
a military contribution.
1119.  On 17 January, Mr Blair approved the deployment of UK forces to support
US military preparation in the region.
1120.  He did so without clear advice on the wider strategic implications and
contingent liabilities, including the potential UK responsibility for post-conflict
administration and reconstruction in the event of military action.
540  Public hearing, 4 December 2009, pages 39-40.
541  Cabinet Conclusions, 16 January 2003.
301
Previous page | Contents | Next page