6.4 |
Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, mid-2001
to January 2003
aftermath -
the Coalition must prevent anarchy and internecine fighting
breaking
1103.
Mr Blair asked
the MOD to look at three issues:
“•
We need to
be clear on what we are offering the Iraqi people and
senior
members of
the regime (those below the top 100 on the list531) –
removal of the
senior
hierarchy or minimising resistance or what?
•
Aftermath.
We have to develop a feasible plan.
•
Look at the
unexpected – think through the big ‘what ifs’; oil, WMD,
internecine
fighting –
and develop a strategy.”
1104.
The author of
the record added some “personal observations”,
including:
“The PM
came across as someone with strong convictions that this should,
and
will, go
ahead. He accepted the military advice being given to him, although
he
still
sought reassurance that all aspects had been looked into and that
plans are
drawn up to
deal with the unexpected or perceived worse cases. It is clear from
the
three areas
that he asked further work to be done on that the Phase IV part of
the
plan is
critical.
…
“Interestingly
it was SofS [Secretary of State, Mr Hoon] who urged the PM
to
exercise a
degree of restraint on POTUS [the President of the United States],
whom
he
described as ‘going for it’. SofS expressed concern about some of
the US ideas
and wanted
to ensure that no irreversible damage was done to
Iraq.”
1105.
After the
briefing by the Chiefs of Staff, Mr Rycroft informed Mr Watkins
that
Mr Blair
agreed that “much greater clarity about US intentions” on
post-conflict issues
was
needed.532
Mr Blair
“would be keen to see the outcome of the Whitehall visit
to
Washington
next week”.533
1106.
Mr Watkins
instructed Mr Lee:
“… we will
clearly need to use all our regular contacts with the US, in
both
CENTCOM and
the Pentagon. If appropriate, this [aftermath] is an issue
that
Mr Hoon
could himself raise with Rumsfeld in their next regular phone
call
530
Minute
MA/DCJO to MA/CJO, 15 January 2003, ‘Briefing to Prime
Minister’.
531
The Inquiry
has not seen any indication of what was meant by “the top 100 on
the list”. It is likely
that it was
a precursor to the list of 55 Iraqis featured on the “deck of
cards” issued by the US military in
April 2003.
532
Letter
Rycroft to Watkins, 15 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Military
Planning’.
533 A
reference to the second round of US/UK/Australia talks on
post-conflict issues in Washington on
22 January.
534
Minute
Watkins to DG Op Pol, 16 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Military
Planning’.
299