Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
including credibility of plans for the aftermath. Mr Johnson described the proposed UK
AOR in the South as “a coherent one”.
1095.  Mr Hoon’s letter to No.10 was sent on 16 January.
1096.  The Inquiry has not seen any indication of the detailed analysis supporting
the conclusion that the proposed AOR in the South was “a coherent one”.
1097.  Before the meeting with the Chiefs of Staff, Mr Rycroft provided Mr Blair
with “some difficult questions” to raise, as suggested by Mr Powell, including on
post‑conflict issues:
“– What military involvement do you foresee in the aftermath?
– Will we be running Basra?
– Will the targeting in the campaign take account of the need to run (parts of) Iraq
in the aftermath?”529
1098.  Definitive answers to those questions required cross-departmental advice
and collective consideration. There is no indication that other departments were
consulted formally before or immediately after the meeting on 15 January.
1099.  On 15 January, Mr Blair told the Chiefs of Staff “the ‘Issue’ was aftermath –
the Coalition must prevent anarchy and internecine fighting breaking out”.
1100.  Mr Blair agreed that much greater clarity was needed on US intentions and
asked the MOD to think through the unexpected, including on oil, use of WMD and
internecine fighting.
1101.  Several accounts of the 15 January meeting were produced by MOD participants,
in addition to a No.10 record of the discussion (see Section 6.2).
1102.  The “unofficial” PJHQ account of Mr Blair’s meeting produced for Lt Gen Reith,
who was in the Middle East at the CENTCOM Commanders’ Conference, provided
the fullest account of the discussion of post-conflict issues. Issues raised by Mr Blair
included:
“Worst Case. The PM wanted to know what CDS [Adm Boyce] thought was the
worst case scenario. After much discussion about destroying the oil infrastructure,
use of WMD and hunkering down in Baghdad and fighting it out, it was felt that the
worst case was internecine fighting between Sunni and Shia, as well as the Kurds/
Turks/Iraqis.
“Aftermath. This led on to a general discussion on aftermath, with the PM asking
what the Iraqi view on it was. CDS stated that the thinking on this issue was ‘woolly’
at this stage, with work only just beginning. The PM stated that the ‘Issue’ was
529  Minute Rycroft to Prime Minister, 14 January 2003, Iraq: Military Planning: Meeting with Chiefs of Staff’.
298
Previous page | Contents | Next page