6.4 |
Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, mid-2001
to January 2003
855.
BP raised its
concerns with Mr Brenton in Washington the same
day.415
856.
On 6 November,
the FCO hosted a presentation on Iraqi energy given by a
team
from
BP.416
The
presentation spelt out Iraq’s importance to oil companies: it had
the
second
largest proven oil reserves in the world and “unique ‘yet to find’
potential”, but the
oil
industry was “a mess” and had to run fast to stand
still.
857.
The record of
the seminar was sent to Mr Powell and Sir David Manning
as
evidence of
why Iraq was so important to BP.417
858.
Mr Powell sent
it to Mr Blair, who asked: “but what do we do about
it?”418
859.
BP called on
Mr Brenton in Washington again on 11 November.419
Sir
Christopher
Meyer told
Sir David Manning that UK oil companies had been told by the
Embassy that
“US
motivation as regards Iraq parallels our own: this is a matter of
national security, not
oil …
Nevertheless, the rumours persist.”
860.
Sir
Christopher continued:
“We have
seen a report from our team at CENTCOM which suggests that
the
Pentagon
has already awarded a contract to Kellogg, Brown and Root, a
subsidiary
of
Haliburton, to restore the Iraqi oil industry to production levels
of 3m bpd
[barrels
per day]. (Haliburton is of course, the company of which Cheney
was
previously
chairman). We have so far been unable to obtain collateral for this
from
the
Administration, and it might well in any case amount to no more
than prudent
contingency
planning to stabilise Iraqi oil facilities if Saddam attempts to
damage
them in a
conflict.
“Either
way, there is clearly an issue here which we need to tackle.
Raising it in an
effective
way with the Administration is a delicate matter. My view remains
that the
only
realistic way in to this is via a PM intervention with Bush … The
points to make
would
be:
•
Once Saddam
has been disarmed … Iraq’s oil industry will be central to
…
economic
recovery.
•
We, as you,
have energy majors who have skills and resources to help
…
•
To give the
lie to suggestions that this campaign is all about oil, it is
vitally
important
that, once sanctions are lifted, there is seen to be a level
playing field
for all
companies to work in Iraq.”
415
Telegram
1418 Washington to FCO London, 31 October 2002, ‘BP & Iraqi
Oil’.
416
Minute
Economic Policy Department [junior official] to Arthur, 13 November
2002, ‘BP/Iraqi Energy’.
417
Manuscript
comment Rycroft, 18 November 2002, on Minute Economic Policy
Department [junior
official]
to Arthur, 13 November 2002, ‘BP/Iraqi Energy’.
418
Manuscript
comment Blair on Minute Economic Policy Department [junior
official] to Arthur,
13 November
2002, ‘BP/Iraqi Energy’.
419
Letter
Meyer to Manning, 15 November 2002, ‘Iraqi Oil’.
257