Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
848.  Mr Chaplin discussed post-conflict issues with Mr William Burns, State Department
Assistant Secretary Near East, on 22 November.409 Mr Burns suggested that the
US would want to follow the 6 November Washington talks with a visit to London in
December or, if necessary, January. Mr Chaplin said the UK was working on a paper on
the shape of a post-conflict administration of Iraq, the issue on which “the US and UK
still seemed furthest apart”.
849.  The FCO paper on post-conflict administration was shared with the US on
12 December.410
Post-Saddam Hussein oil contracts
850.  During October and November 2002, UK oil companies expressed concern to
the Government about securing future oil contracts in Iraq.
851.  Sir David Manning raised the issue with Dr Rice in early December.
852.  An oil industry representative called on Mr Chaplin on 2 October, warning that
“by sticking to the rules over Iraq and not going for post-sanctions contracts”, major UK
oil companies would lose out.411 He was concerned that some other countries would
sell their support for US policy for a guarantee that existing deals with the Iraqi regime
would be honoured. Mr Chaplin explained that the FCO was “seized of the issue” and
“determined to get a fair slice of the action for UK companies”.
853.  On 25 October, Mr Brenton reported a conversation with Vice President Cheney’s
office, in which he had been told that Mr Cheney was about to discuss Iraqi oil contracts
with Mr Yevgeny Primakov, the former Russian Prime Minister. Mr Brenton was advised
that Mr Primakov would be told the “bids of those countries which co-operated with the
US over Iraq would be looked at more sympathetically than those which did not”.412
854.  UK companies’ concerns persisted. Representatives of BP, Shell and British
Gas discussed the issue with Baroness Symons on 31 October.413 Baroness Symons
reported to Mr Straw that she had said:
“… we could not make any definitive undertakings, given our determination that any
action in relation to Iraq is prompted by our concerns over WMD, and not a desire
for commercial gains.
“However, I undertook to draw this issue to your attention as a matter of urgency.
They were genuinely convinced that deals were being struck and that British
interests are being left to one side.”414
409  Telegram 622 FCO London to Washington, 25 November 2002, ‘Iraq: US Views, 22 November 2002’.
410  Minute Dodd to Manning, 19 December 2002, ‘Ad Hoc Group on Iraq’.
411  Email Chaplin to Gray, 2 October 2002, ‘Iraq – Views of UK Business’.
412  Letter Brenton to Chaplin, 25 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Oil’.
413  Minute Segar to PS/Baroness Symons, 31 October 2002, ‘Iraq Oil’.
414  Minute Symons to Straw, 1 November 2002, ‘Iraqi Oil and Gas’.
256
Previous page | Contents | Next page