Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
We should preclude only a small number of members of the old regime … from
participating in the post-Saddam political order. We will most likely need the
assistance of many associated in some way with the old regime to maintain
order and establish a new viable state …
We should avoid imposing a particular ruler or party on Iraq, but cannot allow
Iraq to degenerate into chaos … We should work with our partners to launch a
political process that will allow the Iraqi people to move toward self-government …
We need to contain potential meddling by Iraq’s neighbours, as well as by
other international actors … We need to maintain broad and effective bilateral
dialogue with these countries, forge a six plus two-like forum302 for co-ordination
among Iraq’s neighbours and most interested outside powers, and … strive to
develop new mechanisms to manage security concerns in the region as well as
promote economic linkages …
… We should assert forceful, public [US] leadership of the security operations,
and then guide the other components of the reconstruction effort from behind the
scenes as we are now doing in Afghanistan.”
564.  The Haass memorandum did not have an impact in Washington. Mr Haass
recorded that Secretary Powell agreed most of it and sent copies to Secretary Rumsfeld,
Dr Rice and Vice President Cheney:
“No one could argue that these perspectives had not been raised, although it
was true that the lack of any meaningful inter-agency process or oversight of the
aftermath made it too easy for the Defense Department (which was essentially left
by the NSC to oversee itself) to ignore advice from the outside.”
565.  A copy of the memorandum was handed to UK officials by the State Department
in late 2002.303
SPG PAPER, 30 SEPTEMBER 2002: ‘UK MILITARY STRATEGIC THINKING ON IRAQ’
566.  The “aftermath” section of the fourth edition of the SPG paper on UK
strategic military thinking:
raised concerns about US post-conflict policy, including the US approach
to de-Ba’athification, which could run counter to the need for basic
governance and increase post-conflict reliance on the external authority;
listed the principal post-conflict challenges in Iraq, including law and order
and effective administration;
302 Afghanistan’s six neighbours (Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, China and Pakistan),
the US and Russia.
303  Manuscript comment [unattributed] on Paper [unattributed and undated], ‘Reconstruction in Iraq –
Lessons of the Past’.
208
Previous page | Contents | Next page