Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.4  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, mid-2001 to January 2003
of a perpetual discussion, interaction with various Iraqi opposition groups and the
analysis of the country set out in the various FCO papers.”179
309.  On 12 September, Sir David Manning commissioned advice from the FCO on what
a post-Saddam Hussein government might look like.180
310.  At his request, Mr Blair received a pack of reading material on Iraq at the
beginning of August 2002, including on the extent of economic degradation in Iraq
since 1991 and the complex interaction between tribal allegiance, ethnic identity,
religious affiliation and political persuasion.
311.  In late July, Mr Blair asked his staff to assemble a pack of “summer reading
material” on Iraq.181
312.  The material supplied by the FCO, DIS and Mr Scarlett included the DIS papers on
removing Saddam Hussein, Iraq’s infrastructure, the role of the Ba’ath Party and the role
of Iraq’s tribes in internal security produced earlier in the year.
313.  Mr Scarlett sent Mr Blair an assessment of the cohesiveness of the Iraqi regime,
in which he stated:
“Conditions inside Iraq are better now than they were immediately before the start
of the Oil-for-Food (OFF) programme in late 1996. OFF rations guarantee that at
least basic needs are met … The ‘winners’ under sanctions are those with a hand in
sanctions-busting trade … The greatest losers under sanctions have been the middle
classes … The poorer, rural communities in the south may have suffered less.
The agricultural economy may actually have benefited from the rise in prices …”182
314.  Mr Scarlett advised that the Kurds “would probably demand a reversal of the
‘Arabisation’ of the north” after Saddam Hussein’s departure, leading to “a risk of
inter‑ethnic fighting and the expulsion of the Arab community from areas of the north”.
315.  A JIC Assessment of 5 August on the attitudes of regional states to
military action against Iraq stated that the US needed to convince them of its
“determination and ability to remove Saddam Hussein quickly”, and to offer
“credible plans for the aftermath”.
316.  The Assessment also stated that, after a US attack began, “Iran would
probably boost its support for Shia groups working against Saddam”.
179  Statement, 14 January 2011, pages 15-16.
180  Letter Manning to McDonald, 12 September 2002, ‘Iraq’.
181  Minute Rycroft to Blair, 31 July 2002, ‘Iraq: background papers’; Minute Scarlett to Powell,
1 August 2002, ‘Iraq: classified reading material’.
182  Minute Scarlett to Manning, 31 July 2002, ‘The Iraqi regime: risks and threats’.
165
Previous page | Contents | Next page