Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
(Deputy National Security Advisor), Mr Richard Armitage (Deputy Secretary of State)
and Mr Frank Miller (NSC Senior Director for Defense Policy and Arms Control).160
286.  The British Embassy reported that Sir Kevin emphasised the need for clarity
on aftermath management and that Mr Wolfowitz, although he endorsed Sir Kevin’s
view, suggested that aftermath management was in many ways an easier issue than
military planning.
287.  Mr Wolfowitz restated that position in public later in the year.161
288.  On his return, Sir Kevin Tebbit informed No.10 of growing US resolve on aftermath
management and widespread recognition in Washington that the US would remain in
Iraq for several years after military intervention. At the same time, he reported “an air of
unreality, given the enormity of what is envisaged and the absence of planning detail or
policy framework to credibly make it happen”.162
289.  On 23 July, Mr Blair discussed Iraq with Mr Straw, Mr Hoon, Lord Goldsmith,
Sir Richard Wilson, Adm Boyce, Sir Richard Dearlove, Sir Francis Richards (Head
of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)), Mr Scarlett, Mr Powell,
Baroness Morgan (No.10 Director of Political and Government Relations), Mr Campbell
and Sir David Manning (see Section 3.3).163
290.  Sir David Manning’s annotated agenda for Mr Blair indicated that there would be
a lot of ground to cover in a short time. It made no reference to post-conflict issues.164
291.  Mr Rycroft’s record of the meeting said that there had been “little discussion in
Washington of the aftermath” and that Mr Blair’s meeting had concluded that
the UK needed a fuller picture of US planning before taking any firm decisions on its
own commitment.165
292.  In a note commissioning further work from the FCO, MOD and Cabinet Office,
Mr Rycroft recorded that Adm Boyce would send Mr Blair “full details of the proposed
military campaign and options for a UK contribution”.166 No work was commissioned on
post-conflict issues.
293.  Maj Gen Fry raised post-conflict issues in a minute to Lt Gen Pigott on 25 July.167
Maj Gen Fry commented that work on “post-operational” effects had focused so far
160  Telegram 970 Washington to FCO London, 20 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Sir K Tebbit’s Visit to Washington,
18-19 July’.
161  US Department of Defense News Transcript, 18 December 2002, Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz Interview
with Tom Ricks, Washington Post.
162  Letter Tebbit to Manning, 22 July 2002, ‘Iraq’.
163  Minute Rycroft to Manning, 23 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting, 23 July’.
164  Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 22 July 2002, ‘Iraq Meeting: 23 July: Annotated Agenda’.
165  Minute Rycroft to Manning, 23 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting, 23 July’.
166  Letter Rycroft to McDonald, 23 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting, 23 July: follow up’.
167  Minute Fry to MA/DCDS(C), 25 July 2002, ‘Developing Work on UK Options for Operations
Against Iraq.’
162
Previous page | Contents | Next page