Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.4  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, mid-2001 to January 2003
263.  Mr Hoon also recommended that officials from the MOD, FCO and Cabinet Office
“do some more homework urgently” to put Mr Blair in a better position to influence
President Bush and Dr Rice before they were briefed on an updated CENTCOM plan
during August.
264.  Sir Kevin Tebbit advised Mr Hoon on 3 July that Ministers who had not been
exposed to the issues over the previous three months might “run a mile” from the picture
of “a military plan being worked up in a policy vacuum, with no strategic framework”
and “no clearly defined end state”.148 It might be that an Iraq campaign was unlikely to
happen, but that was not certain. If it did happen, the UK might not be able to avoid
being linked to a US military campaign. In those circumstances, it was not responsible
for the UK “to let matters run without greater active engagement designed seriously to
influence US conceptual as well as operational thinking”. The UK needed “some early
careful engagement with the US policy machine, rather than just with the Pentagon”.
265.  Mr Straw endorsed Mr Hoon’s proposals on 8 July.149 He advised Mr Blair:
“We are all agreed that we must act to remove the threat posed by Iraqi WMD. If
the US decide that to do so requires military action then the UK will want to support
them. But this will be harder for us to do without serious US action to address some
of the lacunae in their plan, notably:
no strategic concept for the military plan and, in particular, no thought
apparently given to ‘day after’ scenarios. Although other parts of the US
Administration have done some work on such aspects, US military planning
so far has taken place in a vacuum.”
266.  Mr Straw added: “Regional states in particular will want assurance that the US has
thought through the ‘day after’ questions before giving even tacit support.”
267.  Mr Straw concluded:
“The key point is how to get through to the Americans that the success of any
military operation against Iraq – and protection of our fundamental interests in the
region – depends on devising in advance a coherent strategy which assesses the
political and economic as well as military implications. They must also understand
that we are serious about our conditions for UK involvement.”
268.  The question of whether a satisfactory plan for post-conflict Iraq should have been
a condition for UK involvement in military action is addressed later in this Section and in
Section 6.5.
269.  Mr Hoon’s proposal prompted Mr Nye to advise Mr Brown to write to the MOD to
propose that all options for UK participation in military operations (including smaller and
148  Minute Tebbit to Secretary of State [MOD], 3 July 2002, ‘Iraq’.
149  Letter Straw to Prime Minister, 8 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Contingency Planning’.
159
Previous page | Contents | Next page