Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Government contact with the Iraqi opposition
The Inquiry has seen evidence of four meetings between UK Ministers and the Iraqi
opposition in the year before the invasion of Iraq:
separate meetings with the “Group of Four” (G4) Iraqi opposition parties and the
Iraqi National Conference (INC) in March 2002, hosted by Mr Ben Bradshaw,
FCO Parliamentary Under Secretary of State;
a visit to No.10 by the two leaders of the Iraqi Kurds in December 2002, part of
which was attended by Mr Blair;94 and
a meeting between Mr Straw and “Iraqi exiles” in London on 21 February 2003.95
At official level, by late 2002, it was UK policy “to stay in touch with the thinking of
opposition groups who may have a role to play in shaping a post-Saddam Iraq”.96
“Regular, routine meetings” took place between opposition representatives and junior FCO
officials. There were occasional meetings at senior official level.
153.  On 15 March, Mr William Patey, Head of MED, sent Mr Straw a paper by Research
Analysts on the “nature and role of the opposition to Saddam” commissioned by Sir
David Manning.97
154.  The paper cautioned that the UK’s ability to influence or direct the Iraqi opposition
was constrained by dependence on contacts with Iraqi exiles. Ten years without
diplomatic representation in Iraq meant that the UK knew little about the internal
opposition to Saddam Hussein.
155.  The paper listed three main problems dealing with the external opposition:
the absence of a coherent structure, with Western offers of financial support or
political backing exacerbating rivalries between groups;
the absence of Sunni representation in the INC, which was dominated by
Kurds and Shia Arabs;
lack of credibility. Regional governments had no faith in the INC’s ability to
achieve its goals and high-profile Western support left it open to charges of
being a Western stooge.
156.  Research Analysts reported few signs of co-ordinated opposition in Iraq, where
most organisations were believed to be penetrated by agents of the regime. It concluded
that Saddam Hussein’s immediate successor was most likely to be a senior Sunni
member or ex-member of the Iraqi military.
94  Letter Rycroft to Sinclair, 19 December 2002, ‘Iraqi Kurds: Meeting with Prime Minister, 19 December’.
95  Minute Tanfield to PS/PUS [FCO], 21 February 2003, ‘Iraq Morning Meeting: Key Points’.
96  Telegram 104 FCO London to Amman, 20 November 2002, ‘Iraqi Opposition Sitrep’.
97  Minute Patey to PS [FCO], 15 March 2002, ‘Iraq’ attaching Paper Research Analysts, 14 March 2002,
‘Iraq: the nature and role of the opposition to Saddam Hussein’.
140
Previous page | Contents | Next page