Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.3  |  Military equipment (pre-conflict)
675.  The emergence after the conflict of the scale and nature of the problems
encountered illuminated the extent to which Ministers had been unaware of
risks being taken for which they would have been accountable. The shortfalls
in individual equipment, protection against chemical and biological attack, and
ammunition did not have an impact on the overall success of the invasion.
676.  But they did have an impact on individuals.
677.  In the case of Sgt Steven Roberts, it was judged that his death could have
been prevented if he had still had his body armour.
678.  As the evidence in this Section shows, reports about equipment shortfalls
from the media and from members of the Armed Forces also had a negative
impact on the perceptions of the morale of troops on the ground and on how the
campaign was seen by the public and Parliament.
679.  In addition, analysis of the events in 2003 shows that, until May, neither
PJHQ nor MOD had a proper understanding of the problems with equipment that
units were experiencing on the ground.
680.  Lord Bach was right to have suggested on 11 February 2003 that a direct
and robust system accurately to report on readiness and equipment issues from
theatre to Ministers was needed.
681.  During military operations, reporting to the MOD will always be constrained
by the limitations of military operations and the pressures on those involved, and
military commanders need the freedom to take operational decisions.
682.  In any future operations, however, the MOD should ensure that it has robust
systems in place to accurately report the situation on the ground without usurping
the responsibilities of the chain of command.
109
Previous page | Contents | Next page