Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.3  |  Military equipment (pre-conflict)
396.  Those included NAIADS, RVDs and NBC water bottle tops. The replacement to
NAIADs would not be available before April, RVDs should be delivered into theatre by
14 March and “industry was working flat out” to try and overcome the problem of water
bottle tops. The Chiefs of Staff would discuss NBC at their next meeting.
397.  The meeting also noted that the sustainability of helicopters was “a concern,
including sand filters for Lynx” aircraft.
398.  A ‘CBRN Risk Overview’ was circulated to the Chiefs of Staff on 3 March.194
It stated:
“For operations launched at 15th March 03 we believe that our overall CBRN
defence remains fragile against a sustained CBRN attack … Against the more likely
scenario of occasional limited short range attacks our defences are less fragile. The
fragile assessment is based on a combination of the quality and quantity of some
key equipment, the lack of priority to deploy equipment via AT [Air Transport] (PJHQ
assessment is that these items are low priority assets) to front line personnel and on
the estimated CBRN training state. Further equipment improvements will be limited
even as at 15th April.”
399.  On 4 March, Lord Bach and Dr Lewis Moonie, Parliamentary Under Secretary of
State for Defence and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs, received a briefing about “a number
of CBRN issues currently running” in the media.195 It stated that, “given the WMD context
of our case for confronting Saddam Hussein”, it was important to “first emphasise our
overall confidence in our NBC defence against any perceived threat”.
400.  If the UK’s assessment that CBRN defences were fragile became more widely
known, Ministers should adopt the line that they were not prepared to comment and that
“the protection of our people is our top priority”.
401.  Internally, it was “imperative” that personnel had confidence in the CBRN protective
measures in place and an “open and honest dialogue” about any shortfalls should be
adopted, reassuring them about “the robustness of the overall system”. The areas where
progress had been made should be stressed.
402.  A separate annex provided lines to take against each of the NBC equipment items
that could raise concerns.
403.  At the Chiefs of Staff meeting on 5 March, Rear Admiral Charles Style, Capability
Manager (Strategic Development), said that CBRN risks were “attracting Ministerial
attention”.196 Lord Bach had asked that “CBRN issues” be given priority for air transport,
which was being done in conjunction with the Operational Command’s priorities.
194  Minute DJW and D CBW Pol to COSSEC, 3 March 2003, ‘Iraq Contingency Planning – 4th CBRN
Risk Overview’.
195  Minute Howard to PS/Min(DP), 4 March 2003, ‘Presentation Aspects of CBRN’.
196  Minutes, Chiefs of Staff meeting, 5 March 2003.
63
Previous page | Contents | Next page