Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
reached a point where we will achieve diminishing returns if we stay much longer.
The Iraqis are in a position to assume the mantle.”
507.  At the meeting, Dr Reid said that the political and developmental issues associated
with the transfer of security responsibility in Muthanna in May had been resolved.290
508.  DOP(I) agreed the approach set out in the paper.
509.  Also on 15 February, at the request of the ISOG, the JIC assessed Iraq’s expected
development in 2006.291 The JIC concluded that the new Iraqi Government would be
judged largely by its ability to deliver security, fuel, electricity, jobs and a timeline for
MNF withdrawal, but that there would be little progress on the first four issues over the
next 12 months. The main obstacles to progress were:
“The security situation is the greatest immediate obstacle to economic recovery …
“The new government will be no more competent or united than its predecessor, at
least initially. The new Prime Minister … will have to develop policy within a more
complex political landscape … The tendency of new Ministers to replace the top tier
of officials with friends, family or tribal members will add to the difficulties.
“The Iraqi civil service lacks the ability to deliver at all levels … Although there are
talented individuals, institutional capacity was effectively destroyed under Saddam’s
dictatorship and in the aftermath of his overthrow: de-Ba’athification, which removed
many experienced bureaucrats, has been especially damaging … Endemic
corruption is a significant brake on economic development, pervading the highest
levels of government, but also reaching into provincial and local levels.”
510.  The JIC concluded that:
The new government would come under international pressure to revitalise
its oil sector and push ahead with economic reforms (including the reduction
of domestic fuel and food subsidies), but would proceed cautiously given the
potential for public discontent.
The fragile state of Iraq’s energy infrastructure and continuing insurgent
and criminal attacks would preclude any early progress on energy supplies.
Electricity production currently met only about 45 percent of demand.
There could be no “international solution” to improving essential services in Iraq.
The Iraqi government needed to adopt a strategy to increase growth and invest
in services and infrastructure. Bilateral and multilateral donors could play a
supporting role, for example by strengthening the budget process and providing
technical advice.
290  Minutes, 15 February 2006, DOP(I) meeting.
291  JIC Assessment, 15 February 2006, ‘Iraq’s Development: Expectations and Delivery in 2006’.
280
Previous page | Contents | Next page