Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.2  |  Reconstruction: July 2004 to July 2009
499.  Ministers commented that the UK needed to consider transition in the wider context
of the legacy that the UK would leave behind in those provinces.
500.  Ministers also commented that it would not be possible to retain DFID international
staff in Maysan and Muthanna after transition. In practice, their contribution was “useful
but not vital” and infrastructure projects would continue. Civilian control of both provinces
had been in the hands of the Iraqis since the dissolution of the Coalition Provisional
Authority (CPA) and even without the transition, the intention was to focus the
reconstruction effort in the South on Basra and Dhi Qar. The security challenges posed
by the transition have a significant impact on other donors, including the UN.
501.  DOP(I) commissioned the MOD to produce a paper on the transition reflecting
cross-departmental concerns about the transition, “based on a robust assessment of the
conditions in the two provinces”.
502.  Dr Reid presented that paper to DOP(I) on 15 February (see Section 9.4).289
503.  The MOD paper recommended that both provinces should transition as soon as
possible, with the end of May as a target date.
504.  The MOD stated that the withdrawal of coalition forces would reduce the amount
of development assistance that could be provided to Muthanna and Maysan by the UK
and other donors, and confirmed that DFID was “content with this, recognising that their
existing support is useful, but not essential, to provincial stability”. The MOD continued:
“DFID will encourage other donors (e.g. the Japanese) to ensure that any
unfinished … projects are completed before closure of permanent bases or able
to be completed by local staff and contractors in slower time, and that plans for
operation and maintenance of completed projects have been made … DFID will
encourage donors with large numbers of local staff (USAID, the UN) to consider how
best they could deploy these in Maysan and Muthanna to continue capacity building
and governance support.”
505.  Commanders in MND(SE) were confident that they could facilitate travel by FCO,
DFID and international personnel into the provinces after transition.
506.  The MOD assessed that the UK’s legacy would be “considerable”. ISF
development was on track and would complete in October 2006. In addition:
“UK support has also helped Provincial Governments get on their feet. Working
with ministries in Baghdad, Provincial Councils are able to take decisions, deliver
services, manage budgets and work with donors at a basic level. They are
functioning, but fragile. Increased capacity and recent reforms may not survive
political rivalries and reduced levels of donor support. But in both Provinces we have
289  Paper Secretary of State [Defence], 14 February 2006, ‘Iraq: Handover of Security in Maysan and
al Muthanna Provinces’.
279
Previous page | Contents | Next page