Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.3  |  Military equipment (pre-conflict)
242.  Lt Gen Pigott produced an update on UORs for the Chiefs of Staff on 21 October.116
Tranche 1 UORs were being implemented: two UORs had been approved so far and a
further 64 USURs117 had been formally endorsed by PJHQ and the Director of Special
Forces (DSF).
243.  Lt Gen Pigott wrote that a working group had been established to inform the Chiefs
on the risks associated of operating in a CBRN environment. The provision of COLPRO
was being reviewed but detailed checks on armoured vehicle NBC filter packs was not
possible under the current visibility guidelines. Routine appraisals were being carried out
and checks were being incorporated into those.
244.  Where there was no ambiguity about the purpose of the requirement, Mr Hoon
was to be consulted before industry was approached. The measures that fell into this
category included:
weapons stocks;
satellite communications technology;
fuel distribution and water carriage systems;
ECBA;
COLPRO for NBC attacks, including antibiotics for all personnel which was
considered essential; and
desert clothing.
245.  The Chiefs of Staff approved Lt Gen Pigott’s paper at their meeting on 28 October
and ACM Bagnall was directed to “take the work forward”.118
246.  The minutes do not record any reference to specific UORs or equipment
capabilities raised in Lt Gen Pigott’s minute.
247.  On 29 October, Major General David Richards, Assistant Chief of the General Staff
(ACGS), wrote to Lt Gen Pigott about his paper of 21 October, stating that he was:
“… content to endorse the recommendations within the paper subject to the
requirement to increase the pace at which we address the UORs concerning NBC
COLPRO and decontamination. There is a significant delta between current UORs
and our anticipated requirement which needs urgent work.”119
248.  Between 31 October and the middle of December 2002, Ministerial decisions
and military planning and preparations were based on advice that the deployment
116  Minute DCDS(C) to COS, 21 October 2002, ‘Iraq Contingency Planning – Urgent Operational
Requirements and Related Funding Issues’.
117  Urgent Statement of User Requests (USURs) are raised when there is a capability gap that needs
addressing by the procurement of new equipment. That process is explained in detail in Section 14.1.
118  Minutes, 28 October 2002, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
119  Minute ACGS to MA1/DCDS(C), 29 October 2002, ‘Iraq Contingency Planning – Urgent Operational
Requirements and Related Funding Issues’.
37
Previous page | Contents | Next page