Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
167.  Air Vice Marshal Clive Loader, Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff (Operations),
told Mr Bowen on 16 August that he had been directed to “drill down” on equipment
issues in the planning phase and was setting up an Equipment and Sustainability
Working Group.76 Draft Terms of Reference for the Group were attached.
168.  AVM Loader wrote that, in accordance with directions from Mr Hoon’s Private
Office, consultation would “be strictly limited to those on the Centurion and Warrior lists”.
169.  The Terms of Reference described the Working Group’s purpose as “taking
forward the analysis of equipment and sustainability issues” with a “particular emphasis”
on equipment availability and support. Work would be based on all three possible
packages. The Working Group would gather “all internal data” to place itself “in the best
position to take these issues forward” when clearance was granted.
170.  The Working Group’s scope would be “medical equipment and sustainability
issues”, including the issue of antitoxins. Consultation would be limited to the Centurion
Group, “though outsiders may be approached for specific detail in response to specific
questions where no connection to specific planning for operations against Iraq within
a defined timescale is inferred”.
171.  The Working Group would consider which force elements could be delivered in either
two or four months, aligning to “potential key dates on the US timescale”, from September
2002. Where it was not possible to deliver the force element, the Working Group would
consider the implications upon force packages. That would “allow those firming up the
package” to identify what the UK could provide and where any shortfalls lay.
172.  “Single Service sustainability work” would be checked by the DLO to ensure that
centrally provided commodities, such as fuel and rations, were included for the entire
force package.
173.  The Terms of Reference categorised equipment under the same headings provided
in the MOD advice to Mr Hoon on 30 July. Those were defined as:
“Essential now”: items “without which the force cannot deploy – they are
showstoppers”.
“Full operational capability enhancers”: required to give the force “a fully
generated operational capability for up to 30 days of combat”.
“Follow-on enhancements”: items beyond the minimum required for up to
30 days of combat and those that would “achieve a substantial measure of risk
reduction”.
76  Minute ACDS (Ops) to DG Op Pol, 16 August 2002, ‘Equipment and Sustainability Working Group’
attaching Paper, 16 August 2002, ‘Equipment and Sustainability Working Group Terms of Reference’.
26
Previous page | Contents | Next page