Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“maximum contribution … at the lower end of large scale … medium scale (minus) for
maritime (about 10 major warships), and medium scale for air (about 60 fast jets)”.
91.  The force mix might not be evenly balanced (in terms of scale of effort) across the
sea, land and air environments; but the UK would “always seek to achieve strategic
influence across the three environments such that UK influence is in place throughout
the joint environment”.
92.  Lt Gen Pigott presented the findings from the SPG analysis to Mr Hoon on 24 May.43
He advised that “until there is greater visibility and clarity of US intent our work on
potential approaches to an Iraq campaign remains speculative; this work is advancing
but will lack definition until we engage with the US”.
93.  Three broad options (“force packages”) had been identified, which were “illustrative
of the maximum potential … contribution” that the UK might be able to make available
for any offensive operations within given time periods:
a. Three months’ warning: Deployment of medium scale joint force – 10 warships
including a carrier, an armoured brigade, about 60 fast jets and associated support.
That was described as at risk of being a “token contribution”. The cost, including
“essential” UORs for equipping the force was estimated at £500m to £800m.
b.  Six months’ warning: Deployment of a large scale, war-fighting force in addition
to the medium scale maritime and air components, which would be “comparable
to the 1990/1991 conflict” and “confer significant influence on the control of the
campaign”. Though the land element would be “capable of limited independent
war-fighting”, there would be sustainability issues. Large numbers of vehicles
could become “unserviceable” and there would be reliance on others to supply
ammunition and other stock. There would not be enough time for “the procurement
and fitting of all UOR equipment considered to be essential for operations in the
Gulf (such as the desertisation of all armoured vehicles)”, which would generate
further operational risks and result in the degradation of the “credibility of the UK’s
contribution as [the] campaign unfolded”. That option would require the call out of
5,000-10,000 Reservists and cost £800m to £1.1bn. A decision would need to be
taken immediately for operations to begin in December 2002.
c. Nine months’ warning: The force package would be the same as (b) but would
be better prepared and carry fewer risks, as a result of additional training and
equipment. The package would have “enough capability and sustainability to
be a credible contribution to any coalition”. The cost would be £100m higher
because of a greater volume of UORs.
94.  The deployment and campaign costs would be additional to the costs identified for
each option.
43  Minute DCDS(C) to PS/Secretary of State [MOD], 24 May 2002, ‘Iraq’.
16
Previous page | Contents | Next page