Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.2  |  Military planning for the invasion, January to March 2003
607.  Adm Boyce also spoke to Gen Myers on 11 March.206 He reported that, following
his visits to Op TELIC theatre, and discussions with commanders, units were ready and
people would be deployed by 19 March.
608.  Gen Myers indicated that he had told Gen Franks to work the “no UK option”.
609.  The minutes from the Chiefs of Staff meeting on 12 March stated that Secretary
Rumsfeld had spoken publicly about the possibility of the US commencing action
“without the UK at her side”.207 The political decision to commit UK forces to Phases III
and IV had “not yet been made, though planning continued as directed by HMG”.
610.  In response to the request for a statement on the basis for his assurance to
Mr Blair that the US plan for the invasion represented a “winning concept”, Lord Boyce
wrote:
“The threat was carefully assessed, including taking into account the possible
deployment of CW/BW weapons by Saddam, and measured against the capability
of the Coalition Forces. There was complete confidence from CENTCOM and
ourselves that Iraqi forces could be defeated.”208
611.  Lord Boyce’s statement in respect of Phase IV is addressed in Section 6.5.
612.  Asked whether Ministers had a clear sense of how important the UK contribution
had become to the campaign plan, Lord Boyce told the Inquiry: “I think so …”209
613.  Lord Boyce added that his personal view was that the US could not have begun
the military campaign without the UK contribution: Secretary Rumsfeld’s comments that
the US could manage on its own were right, but the US would not have managed on
its own on 19 March.210
614.  Lord Boyce told the Inquiry:
“… as far as the fighting phase is concerned we were satisfied we were there. As far
as the aftermath planning was concerned, we thought we had something which was
going to cope with, as far as our imagination allowed us to look; our imaginations
didn’t basically go wide enough … to what actually transpired when the time came.”211
DIS Memorandum, 11 March 2003: ‘Basra: Post-Saddam Governance’
615.  The DIS produced a Memorandum on the “post-Saddam” political and security
environment Coalition Forces were likely to encounter in Basra City on 11 March.212
206  Minute Zambellas to CDS, 12 March 2003, ‘Record of CDS/CJCS Telephone Call: 11 Mar 2003’.
207  Minutes, 12 March 2003, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
208  Statement, 7 January 2011.
209  Public hearing, 27 January 2011, page 62.
210  Public hearing, 27 January 2011, page 63.
211  Public hearing, 27 January 2011, page 99.
212  Paper DIS, 11 March 2003, ‘Basra: Post Saddam Governance’.
483
Previous page | Contents | Next page