Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.2  |  Military planning for the invasion, January to March 2003
advice of 7 March before Mr Blair’s meeting on 11 March, but it is not clear how and
when it reached them.
578.  Ms Cathy Adams, Legal Counsellor in the Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers,
advised Lord Goldsmith that she understood “the principal purpose of the meeting to
be to discuss the ad bellum issue”.191
579.  An hour before the meeting took place, MOD Legal Advisers provided questions for
Mr Hoon to raise at the meeting, explaining:
“… some in the FCO – whether having read the AG [Attorney General]’s letter or not,
I don’t know – are beginning to believe that the legal base is already OK. It seems to
us – and I have discussed this with Martin Hemming [the MOD Legal Adviser] – that
the position is not yet so clear.”192
580.  The document provided for Mr Hoon stated:
“Questions for the Attorney General
“If no 2nd resolution is adopted (for whatever reason), and the PM decides that
sufficient evidence exists that Iraq has failed to take the final opportunity to comply
offered by 1441, is he satisfied that the currently proposed use of force would be
lawful under international law?
“Comment: The AG’s minute to the PM is equivocal: he says ‘a reasonable case
can be made’ [for the revival argument] but also says that his view is that ‘different
considerations apply in different circumstances’ [meaning the nature of the Security
Council discussions under OP12]. He ends his summary thus: ‘If we fail to achieve
the adoption of a second resolution we would need to consider urgently at that stage
the strength of our legal case in the light of circumstances at the time’.
“If the answer is yes to the above, can it be assumed that the Attorney will be able
to confirm formally at the time that CDS’s order to implement the planned operation
would be a lawful order (anybody subject to military law commits an offence if he
disobeys any lawful command).
“Comment: Notwithstanding the current uncertainties, when it comes to the crunch,
CDS will need to be assured that his orders are lawful. As the Attorney points out
in his letter, ‘on previous occasions when military action was taken on the basis of
a reasonably arguable case, the degree of public and Parliamentary scrutiny of the
legal issue was nothing like as great as it is today’.”
191  Minute Adams to Attorney General, 11 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Meeting at No.10, 1PM’.
192  Email DG OpPol-S to SofS-Private Office-S [MOD], 11 March 2003, ‘Urgent for Peter Watkins’ attaching
Paper ‘Questions for the Attorney General’.
477
Previous page | Contents | Next page