Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.2  |  Military planning for the invasion, January to March 2003
CENTCOM’s proposal for a UK Division in the South
9.  At the beginning of 2003, the US asked the UK to provide ground forces in
the South.
10.  Major General Albert Whitley, Senior British Land Adviser and Deputy Commanding
General (Post Hostilities), told the Inquiry that, after General Tommy Franks,
Commander in Chief US Central Command (CENTCOM), had decided not to move
the US 4th Infantry Division south, he had discussed with Lieutenant General David
McKiernan, Commander, Coalition Forces Land Component Command (CFLCC),
on 28 December 2002 whether it would be possible to use UK forces in the South to
augment US forces.2
11.  On 5 January, Brigadier Whitley prepared a paper for the Permanent Joint
Headquarters (PJHQ) on “the imperatives for timely decision making for the commitment
of UK Land Forces” to the US Operational Plan.3
12.  Brigadier Whitley explained that uncertainties about whether Turkey would allow
transit of ground forces had led US and UK planners, on 28 December, urgently
to concentrate on developing robust operations from the south. He recorded that
“even if the UK were … granted transit through Turkey … the complexity and scope
of the problem … from a purely operational view point, would not be welcomed”.
13.  Instead, Lt Gen McKiernan “would welcome the commitment of a UK division in the
South from the start of the operation”. That would allow him to merge Phases II and III of
the campaign and both of the major subordinate US commands, V Corps and 1 Marine
Expeditionary Force (1 MEF), to strike north fast. The UK mission would be to “seize,
secure and control” the rear area and right flank of the operation and provide a coherent
transition to Phase IV (post-conflict) operations in captured territory without loss of US
combat forces. That would include securing infrastructure such as Umm Qasr and the
Rumaylah oilfields, and fixing Iraqi forces in the Basra area. The UK Area of Operations
(AO)4 was likely to be bounded by the Iraq/Kuwait border, the US V Corps/1 MEF
boundary, Jalibah air field and the Euphrates, an area about the same size as Kuwait
(approximately 17,800 sq km).
14.  Brigadier Whitley reported that the US saw the involvement of a UK division in this
role as “so important … they will do anything to assist within their power providing there
is time to do so”. In his view, that would allow the UK force to be “less balanced in its
capability than our doctrine and philosophy demand because the US will provide key
support particularly in fires and air defence”.
2  Statement, 25 January 2011, pages 6-7.
3  Paper Comd SBLA, 5 January 2003, ‘Decision Imperatives’.
4  Definitions and usage of the terms Area of Operations (AO) and Area of Responsibility (AOR) are given
in Section 6.4.
389
Previous page | Contents | Next page