Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Key findings
The size and composition of a UK military contribution to the US-led invasion of Iraq
was largely discretionary. The US wanted some UK capabilities (including Special
Forces), to use UK bases, and the involvement of the UK military to avoid the
perception of unilateral US military action. The primary impetus to maximise the size
of the UK contribution and the recommendations on its composition came from the
Armed Forces, with the agreement of Mr Hoon.
The decisions taken between mid-December 2002 and mid-January 2003 to increase
the combat force deployed to three brigades and bring forward the date on which UK
forces might participate in combat operations compressed the timescales available
for preparation.
The decision to deploy a large scale force for potential combat operations was taken
without collective Ministerial consideration of the decision and its implications.
The large scale force deployed was a one-shot capability. It would have been difficult
to sustain the force if combat operations had been delayed until autumn 2003 or
longer, and it constrained the capabilities which were available for a UK military
contribution to post-conflict operations.
The switch to the South
3.  The initial planning for a military invasion of Iraq and the decision on 31 October 2002
to offer ground forces to the US for planning purposes are addressed in Section 6.1.
4.  The main planning assumption throughout 2002 was that the UK would provide air
and maritime forces in support of US operations in southern Iraq, but that UK ground
forces would be deployed through Turkey for operations in northern Iraq.
5.  As Section 6.1 sets out, there was no certainty that Turkey would agree to the
UK deployment.
6.  Mr Blair had also been considering a number of issues over the Christmas holiday
in 2002. On 4 January 2003 he produced a long note to officials in No.10 on a range
of issues.1
7.  On military preparations, Mr Blair wrote that there was a need to make sure that the
military plan was “viable”; and that he needed a meeting and the “military’s assurance
that the plan can work. This is no small undertaking.”
8.  Other points in the note are addressed in Section 3.6.
1  Note Blair [to No.10 officials], 4 January 2003, [extract ‘Iraq’].
388
Previous page | Contents | Next page