Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
US ground operations would be synchronised as closely as possible with the beginning
of air operations, which it was judged would lead to the rapid collapse of much potential
opposition.483
1262.  In addition, the US was now thinking of “an information operation supported by
manoeuvre, rather than a manoeuvre operation supported by information operation”.
Control of Iraq’s oilfields (North and South), rather than control of Baghdad, was seen
as the strategic key to control of Iraq. It would prevent the Iraqi regime from using oil
as a weapon to cause a humanitarian and environmental catastrophe.
1263.  It would also be essential to fund reconstruction. The US now recognised that
stabilisation and reconstruction of up to two thirds of Iraq would need to begin before the
military campaign had concluded. This was “bringing home to the US military the need
for more planning effort to be devoted to ‘aftermath’ issues now”.
1264.  Copies of the letter were sent to the Private Offices of Mr Straw and Mr Brown,
and to Mr Bowen.
1265.  The US plan for a military campaign, including that the Coalition would not fight
for Baghdad in the initial phase of combat operations, is addressed in Section 8.
1266.  The MOD had not yet reached a conclusion on the alternative options if Turkey
refused transit.
1267.  Mr Straw told Secretary Powell that, in the light of reports about the latest US
military planning, the UK was “anxious about whether this was the right approach”.484
1268.  In response to a request for background material on US and UK military thinking
and preparations, Mr Watkins wrote to Sir David Manning on 20 December.485
1269.  Mr Watkins highlighted “the continuing emphasis in US military planning on
squeezing every possible day out of their timelines, both in preparation for and in the
prosecution of any campaign”. As a result, the UK assumptions about detailed timings
were “potentially subject to acceleration at short notice”. Keeping options open was:
“… likely to require visible steps early in the New Year … including a first call‑out of
reserves in the first half of January and high profile maritime deployments around
the middle of the month.”
1270.  An early conclusion on whether the UK could deploy through Turkey “and thus
on the shape of the UK land contribution” was also needed.
1271.  Mr Watkins concluded that there would be “an increasingly pressing need to
satisfy ourselves that the US has an overarching political strategy with which the
483 Letter Williams to Manning, 19 December 2002, ‘Iraq: Evolving US Military Thinking’.
484 Letter McDonald to Manning, 19 December 2002, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Colin Powell, 19 December’.
485 Letter Watkins to Manning, 20 December 2002, ‘Iraq: Christmas Reading’.
363
Previous page | Contents | Next page