Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
367.  The section on “handling” in the previous draft had been expanded to include
“NGOs”:
“The announcement [of] any drawdown of UK forces in the South will have to
be carefully managed to ensure that there is no loss of confidence by NGOs
(in particular the UN agencies and the World Bank), which might lead them to
postpone plans for greater engagement in Iraq.”
368.  The section on resources had also been expanded:
“Other Government Departments operating in Iraq may … face increased security
costs as they are forced to seek commercial alternatives to military force protection.”
369.  DOP(I) agreed Dr Reid’s recommendation that, subject to the continuation of
current trends in the capacity of the Iraqi security forces and to there being no major
deterioration in the security situation, the UK should plan to implement transition to Iraqi
control in Maysan and Muthanna from around October 2005, and in Dhi Qar and Basra
from around March 2006.214
370.  DOP(I) commented that too much of the money allocated for reconstruction had
been spent on foreign contractors and security.215 The UK should now be focusing on
delivering through Iraqi structures.
371.  DOP(I) also considered an FCO paper entitled ‘Splitting the Jihadists from the
National Opposition’.216 The FCO recommended action on eight “lines”, the last of which
was reconstruction:
Rapid implementation of reconstruction projects, specifically following large scale
anti-insurgency operations or local cease-fires:
Aims: Demonstrate ITG/MNF ability to rebuild and compensate following
operations/cease-fires. Quick support to Iraqi capacity to deliver. Installation of basic
services. Establishment of political and security structures. Employment creation.
Deny opportunity to insurgency to work up dissatisfaction.
Means: … Key donors and ITG to review how to reprogramme/redefine donor
assistance to make available rapidly disbursable aid (eg. creation of a special fund
for quick impact projects in politically sensitive areas), including from the private
sector. Media (foreign and Iraq) coverage of successful redevelopment projects.”
372.  DOP(I) agreed the “broad approach” set out in the FCO paper.217
214  Minutes, 21 July 2005, DOP(I) meeting; Paper Secretary of State for Defence, 18 July 2005,
‘Operational Transition in Iraq’.
215  Minutes, 21 July 2005, DOP(I) meeting.
216  Paper FCO, 18 July 2005, ‘Iraq: Splitting the Jihadists from the National Opposition’; Minutes,
21 July 2005, DOP(I) meeting.
217  Minutes, 21 July 2005, DOP(I) meeting.
258
Previous page | Contents | Next page