Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
The deployment of the Amphibious Ready Group was “still to be decided”.
Demand for logistics and support helicopters “concurrent with Package 3” would
“detract from main effort for dubious military effect”.430
1094.  In his manuscript comments Adm Boyce indicated his agreement with the first two
comments above, and wrote “Yes” alongside the request for confirmation that the UK
should be involved in early action.431
1095.  The Chiefs of Staff meeting on 27 November was informed that:
“If the UK wished to match US timelines and UK political expectations, Ministerial
approval for a more forward leaning military posture was required.”432
1096.  Maj Gen Fry stated that neither the ARG, which was “an integral part” of the US
plan, nor Package 3 could meet US aspirations for a Running Start. PJHQ had identified
a series of measures which would allow them to “close towards or match US timelines”.
1097.  The Chiefs of Staff invited PJHQ to refine its advice with a view to seeking
convergence with US timelines.
1098.  A “Post Meeting Direction” instructed PJHQ to provide advice “on the advantages
and disadvantages of deploying the ARG”, including deploying “manoeuvre elements”
[Royal Marines] and the implications for chartered shipping.
1099.  In Adm Boyce’s absence, the meeting was chaired by ACM Bagnall.
1100.  The MOD informed No.10 on 29 November that the US political strategy
remained unclear but CENTCOM was seeking to reduce the lead time between
a political decision and military action.
1101.  A gap was developing between the readiness of US and UK forces, which
would need visible action to address.
1102.  If Turkey did not agree to UK forces, more political guidance would be
needed before the MOD could go far in developing other options.
1103.  Sir David Manning wrote to Mr Watkins on 27 November, requesting a note for
Mr Blair on the progress of US planning.433 He asked: “Are our Chiefs of Staff content
with the US plans and ready to support them?” He also asked how the UK would
participate if the northern option was not available.
430 Manuscript comment [unattributed] to CDS on Minute DCJO(Ops) to COSSEC, 25 November 2002,
‘The UK Response to a Running Start for Combat Operations – COA2’.
431 Manuscript comment CDS on Minute DCJO(Ops) to COSSEC, 25 November 2002, ‘The UK Response
to a Running Start for Combat Operations – COA2’.
432 Minutes, 27 November 2002, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
433 Letter Manning to Watkins, 27 November 2002, ‘Iraq: Military Planning’.
340
Previous page | Contents | Next page