Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
Military planning for the northern option
1012.  When the Chiefs of Staff met on 6 November they noted that there were two
options for the employment of a UK land force in the North: either integration in a
division under US command or the formation of a separate division, for which the UK
would provide the HQ and a square brigade, possibly sweeping up Coalition partners.400
1013.  The meeting was also informed that:
The total UK contribution “currently remained Medium Scale” and it did not follow
that the UK contribution would increase in the event that Op FRESCO was no
longer required.
Ministers had “yet to be exposed” to work on a “Force‑on‑Mind and media
strategy” to cover the period immediately after the UN resolution was adopted.
Package 3 had been “well received by the US”.
Until further notice, discussions on UK deployment through Turkey would be
“taken forward through the US”.
1014.  The Chiefs of Staff also considered a short paper produced by PJHQ on the
practicalities of conducting military operations during an Iraqi summer.401 The paper
concluded that military operations would be possible but at reduced tempo and with
increased risk.
1015.  The Chiefs of Staff noted the advice and asked for a revised paper within a
month.402
1016.  Sir David Manning sent Mr Blair the MOD paper and Mr Bowen’s minute
summarising its contents.403 Sir David also wrote that he had sought Secretary Powell’s
views when he had been in Washington the previous week.
SPG PAPER, 6 NOVEMBER 2002
1017.  A fifth version of the SPG paper ‘UK Military Strategic Thinking on Iraq’ was
produced on 6 November.404 This set out three “broad Courses of Action (COA) to deliver
the end state”:
Diplomatic & Coercion: a UN resolution and inspections. The UK
Government’s main effort (“ME”) was creating and sustaining the resolution of
the international community. Saddam Hussein would need to be convinced that
the international community was “serious, but equally that compliance” would
“reap its rewards” and he was “not in a zero sum game”. The SPG judged
400 Minutes, 6 November 2002, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
401 Minute Reith to PSO/CDS and SECCOS, 5 November 2002, ‘Warfighting in Iraq in the Summer’.
402 Minutes, 6 November 2002, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
403 Manuscript comment Manning to Prime Minister, 8 November 2002, on Minute Bowen to Manning,
8 November 2002, ‘Iraq: Fighting in the Summer’.
404 Paper [SPG], 6 November 2002, ‘UK Military Strategic Thinking on Iraq’.
327
Previous page | Contents | Next page