Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
753.  Draft advice to Mr Hoon was discussed at the Chiefs of Staff meeting on
9 October.305
754.  The Chiefs of Staff were informed that there seemed to be “increasing flexibility”
in Washington over the timing of military activity and that “the weather would not be a
limiting factor”. That might affect UK decision‑making.
755.  Ministers “should be left in no doubt” that the northern option was a “fundamental
part of US planning”. From the Army’s “perspective, Package 3 would guarantee
long‑term strategic influence with the US”.
756.  Air Chief Marshal Sir Peter Squire, Chief of the Air Staff, commented that
Package 2 “did not entail a loss of influence”, and sought “visibility of fallback options
in the South”.
757.  In the context of predicted US discussions with Turkey on 21 October and
reported indications from US military contacts that planning for one scenario whereby
the US acted with the UK and another where it acted alone was “rapidly becoming
untenable”, the Chiefs of Staff considered that:
“Ministers needed to be advised that a non‑public ‘decision in principle’ to contribute
was required, ideally by 21 October. In practice, because of the unpalatable
diplomatic consequences of the UK’s withdrawal after the completion of Ex[ercise]
Internal Look … 15 Oct[ober] was also a key date.”
758.  Lt Gen Reith “observed that a meaningful discussion about, or leverage on, US
planning with Gen Franks would not be possible until a decision (in principle) regarding
the UK contribution had been made.”
759.  In addition, to maintain the UK’s options, a call‑out of some Reserves by the end
of October might be required. That and visible action on UORs “would contribute to the
‘force on mind’ campaign”. A successful coercion strategy was “key to the process”.
760.  The minutes also record the view that “it would be important to guard against the
perception in the US that the UK’s decision was a matter of legitimacy as opposed to a
problem with mobilisation and public perception”.
761.  The Chiefs of Staff directed that the advice to Mr Hoon should be amended to
reflect the discussion, including:
the timing of US discussions with Turkey;
a “decision in principle” on Package 3; and
more explanation of the timelines for decision taking.
305 Minutes, 9 October 2002, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
289
Previous page | Contents | Next page