Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
JIC ASSESSMENT, 21 AUGUST 2002: ‘SADDAM’S DIPLOMATIC AND MILITARY
OPTIONS’
527.  A JIC Assessment of 21 August concluded that in a conflict Saddam
Hussein would order missile strikes and the use of CBW against coalition Forces,
supporting regional states and Israel.
528.  The JIC had little intelligence on Iraq’s CBW and little insight into how it
would fight. Its conclusions reflected the Committee’s own judgements.
529.  At the request of the MOD, the JIC issued an Assessment on 21 August
considering “what diplomatic options Saddam has to deter, avert or limit the scope of
a US‑led attack”.219 It also considered his “military options for facing a US‑led attack”
and how his analysis about each course of action might “change as an attack becomes
increasingly imminent”.
530.  The JIC examined Iraq’s options for the short term, whether Saddam Hussein
might seize the initiative, how Iraq might respond to a US military build‑up, Saddam’s
options in “war” – including the use of missiles and WMD and “alternative scenarios and
at the death”.
531.  The JIC’s Key Judgements on the military options were:
Much as Saddam Hussein would like to seize the initiative before a US attack,
his options remained limited. He was “likely to be cautious about using force
early. But the closer and more credible an attack seemed, the more risks he will
be willing to take, perhaps including deniable terrorist attacks, most likely in the
Gulf region – though we cannot exclude a threat to the UK.”
“Early on in any conflict, Saddam would order missile attacks on Israel, coalition
forces and regional states providing the US with bases.”
“Saddam would order the use of CBW against coalition forces at some point,
probably after a coalition attack had begun. Once Saddam was convinced
that his fate was sealed, he would order the unrestrained use of CBW against
coalition forces, supporting regional states and Israel.”
“Iraq would probably try to ride out air strikes while conserving its ground forces.
Iraq’s likely strategy for a ground war would be to make any coalition advance as
slow and costly as possible, trying to force the coalition to fight in urban areas.”
“There is a significant potential for Saddam to miscalculate, either by escalating
a crisis at an early stage, or by making concessions too late in the day to avert
an attack.”
219 JIC Assessment, 21 August 2002, ‘Iraq: Saddam’s Diplomatic and Military Options’.
255
Previous page | Contents | Next page