Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
518.  The MOD reported on 12 August that President Bush had authorised
preparatory military activities.
519.  The MOD continued to warn No.10 against any assumption that the UK could
take the lead in the North within the timelines being considered by the US.
520.  A meeting of the US National Security Council was held on 5 August to review
what Vice President Cheney described as “the latest iteration of the war plan”.215
521.  Gen Franks described his strategic objective as regime change and his operational
objectives as securing the oilfields and water infrastructure, while preventing Iraq’s use
of long‑range missiles and WMD.216
522.  A letter from Mr Hoon’s Private Office to No.10 on 12 August reported that
President Bush had authorised preparatory military activities costing US$1bn and that
an inter‑agency process in Washington had been launched.217
523.  The MOD reported the emergence of a “hybrid option”, combining elements of both
the generated and running start plan. The US could be in a position to take action in
November and there was:
“… growing enthusiasm in the US for action in northern Iraq led by the UK … we will
need to guard against US assumptions of UK leading ground operations in northern
Iraq … General Franks has indicated his interest in seeing the UK lead such forces.”
524.  Sir David Manning wrote alongside the point above: “An idea our own MOD are v.
keen on; may be some ventriloquism here”.218
525.  The MOD advised that the projected timelines for the deployment of a UK division,
“albeit with limited sustainment and reach”, bore “no relation to the timescale of US
plans”. It might be possible to reduce deployment times if the US provided support, but
the UK would need time for preparation.
526.  The MOD concluded:
“It will be important, therefore, in the coming weeks, to guard against any
assumption that the UK will take the lead from the north or could do so on the basis
of current US timelines. Apart from the impossibility of making military commitments
in advance of political decisions, there are practical constraints, one of which is
the potential requirement to provide emergency cover during any fire strike in the
autumn – not so far revealed to the US.”
215 Cheney D & Cheney L. In My Time: A Personal and Political Memoir. Simon & Schuster, 2011.
216 Franks T & McConnell M. American Soldier. HarperCollins, 2004.
217 Letter Davies to Wechsberg, 12 August 2002, ‘Iraq: US Contingency Planning’.
218 Manuscript comment Manning on Letter Davies to Wechsberg, 12 August 2002, ‘Iraq: US Contingency
Planning’.
254
Previous page | Contents | Next page