Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.1  |  Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq
264.  Lt Gen Pigott explained that current commitments in Afghanistan and subsequent
recovery and deployment times would “limit the UK’s ability to contribute significantly to
any offensive operations in the region until November at the earliest”.
265.  If it was “likely that the UK would wish to contribute” to US action “when the call
came”, there was a “need to consider what action” was needed “now to reduce risks and
as far as possible readiness times”.
266.  Mr Hoon was asked to agree further work to refine contingency planning, to be
submitted in mid‑June; and was informed that “proper preparations” would require wider
involvement in the MOD and discreet approaches to industry.
267.  In a meeting with Sir Kevin Tebbit, ACM Bagnall, Mr Webb, Mr Bowen, and others,
on 27 May, Mr Hoon agreed that the best approach would be to explain the practical
constraints the UK faced in assembling a useful force package to Secretary Rumsfeld.132
268.  Mr Hoon told the Inquiry that he had thought the land option “quite a big ask, given
our extensive involvement in Afghanistan at the time”; “it was undoubtedly the case” that
the UK would be “taken more seriously if we were making a substantial contribution”,
and that that influence would extend to shaping the policy.133
Meeting with Secretary Rumsfeld, 5 June 2002
269.  In preparation for a visit to the UK by Secretary Rumsfeld on 5 June, Mr Hoon
wrote to Mr Blair on 31 May.
270.  Mr Hoon advised that he and Mr Straw had agreed a preliminary objective
to guide planning. Instead of calling directly for the elimination of Iraq’s WMD
capability, it called on Iraq to abide by its international obligations on WMD.
The objective did not explicitly mention regime change.
271.  UK contingency planning had concluded that, for the UK to have influence
on US planning, a significant military contribution would be needed. That was
defined as at “division level” for land forces.
272.  To take planning further, greater clarity on US thinking was needed.
273.  Mr Hoon also identified that exposing the constraints on the UK’s ability to
contribute forces before the end of 2002 could reduce its influence.
274.  On 31 May, in advance of a visit by Secretary Rumsfeld, Mr Hoon wrote to Mr Blair,
stating that there had been “no take up” of the offer “to help the US in its planning”, and
setting out the “preliminary conclusions” from the MOD’s contingency planning.134
132 Minute Watkins to MA/DCDS(C), 28 May 2002, ‘Iraq’.
133 Public hearing, 19 January 2010, pages 19‑20.
134 Minute Hoon to Prime Minister, 31 May 2002, ‘Iraq’.
215
Previous page | Contents | Next page