Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“… we have proposed to the Defence Secretary we take forward rapidly two distinct
pieces of work, one on military contingency planning … and the other on coalition
options which will need to factor in legal considerations. Rather than submitting our
Ministers’ conclusions to the Attorney General for his approval, we should prefer the
usual approach of his putting advice to colleagues as part of a collective decision.”116
229.  The letter was sent to Lt Gen Pigott, Sir David Manning and SIS.
230.  By mid‑May, the perception that the UK might provide an armoured division
for military operations had already gained currency in the US.
231.  There is no evidence that such a suggestion had been authorised.
232.  In the absence of an agreed avenue for dialogue between the US and UK
and the sensitivities about the issue on both sides of the Atlantic in the spring of
2002, informal conversations between the US and UK military and between civilian
officials to explore each other’s positions to inform thinking and the development
of advice to Ministers were unavoidable.
233.  Mr Webb visited Washington in mid‑May and discussed draft objectives for a
military operation with US officials (see Section 3.3).117
234.  Mr Webb explained the UK military timelines as:
“… 7 to 9 months for a major contribution of division minus plus air wing etc, shorter
for a smaller package. If they [the US] wanted UK participation this would have to be
factored in.”
235.  Mr Webb also reported his impression that momentum in Washington “had flagged”
since his last substantive discussions in February.
236.  In the context of those discussions, Mr Webb told the Inquiry:
“… once you get into the level of military planning, it doesn’t make a big difference
whether your policy is to remove WMD, and that means Saddam has to go, or
whether you are going to change the regime and take the opportunity to remove
WMD … [I]t’s very important in legal and policy terms …”118
237.  In preparation for Sir David Manning’s visit to Washington, Sir Christopher Meyer
sent a personal letter to Sir David on 15 May.119
116 Letter Webb to Ricketts, 10 May 2002, [untitled].
117 Letter Webb to Ricketts, 16 May 2002, ‘Iraq: Objectives’.
118 Private hearing, 23 June 2010, page 16.
119 Letter Meyer to Manning, 15 May 2002, ‘Your Visit to Washington’.
210
Previous page | Contents | Next page