Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
MR WEBB’S ADVICE, 12 APRIL 2002
170.  Following Mr Blair’s visit to Crawford, Mr Hoon discussed Iraq with Adm Boyce and
Sir Kevin Tebbit on 8 April.90
171.  Mr Hoon “emphasised that no decisions had been taken on military action” but it
was “important that No.10 and others understood the practical steps and (additional)
costs which would be involved”. Therefore as a “precaution against the possibility that
military action might have to be taken at some point in the future”, exploratory work
should be put in hand, conducted “on a very close hold”, to provide:
“… a clearer picture of the potential specific military options – including the
possible UK involvement”; this should indicate the “likely scales of effort and
force generation/deployment timelines”.
“Clarification of what military capability we could deliver on the basis of the …
budgets for 2002/03 and what more might be required to deliver the options”
identified.
“Identification of the additional specific equipment requirements (UORs)
necessary to deliver these options … Equipment – rather than personnel – was
likely to be on the critical path in terms of deployment timelines.”
172.  Mr Hoon asked to discuss the emerging findings and “the ‘think piece’” the
following week.
173.  On 12 April, following consultation with Sir Kevin Tebbit and Adm Boyce, Mr Webb
sent Mr Hoon a think piece entitled “Bush and the War on Terrorism”.91 Mr Webb’s
minute provided formal advice on the possible scale of any UK military contribution and
a draft letter to Mr Blair.
174.  Mr Webb’s paper explored potential end states for military action in Iraq in the
context of Mr Blair’s “commitment to regime change (‘if necessary and justified’)” in his
speech at College Station on 7 April.
175.  Mr Webb added:
“Commitment on timing has been avoided and an expectation has developed
that no significant operation will be mounted while major violence continues in
Israel/Palestine”.
“Both Crawford and contacts with the Pentagon confirm that US thinking has not
identified either a successor or a constitutional restructuring to provide a more
representational regime:
{{“Various ideas for replacements have been aired over the years and none
so far look convincing …”
90 Minute Watkins to PSO/CDS & PS/PUS [MOD], 8 April 2002, ‘Iraq’.
91 Minute Webb to PS/Secretary of State [MOD], 12 April 2002, ‘Bush and the War on Terrorism’.
202
Previous page | Contents | Next page