Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.2  |  Reconstruction: July 2004 to July 2009
276.  Gen Riley reported on 5 April that a fire had completely shut down the main power
station in Nasiriyah, which supplied 50 percent of the electricity to the MND(SE) area.157
He commented:
“This simply serves to point up the fragility of the national supply and to illustrate
that DFID and MND(SE) alone are never going to solve the electricity problem
in southern Iraq. While I still believe that DFID’s US$10m will make a small
difference this summer the symbolic nature of the money is as important as the
power it will produce.”
277.  Gen Riley concluded that “more drastic action” was needed to prevent an even
bigger problem in summer 2006.
DFID reviews its Interim Country Assistance Plan
278.  DFID had published its Interim Country Assistance Plan for Iraq (I-CAP) in
February 2004, at a time when the UK was a joint Occupying Power in Iraq and security
was improving.158
279.  The I-CAP re-stated DFID guidance that progress against a CAP should be
assessed annually, and that a CAP should be subject to a “major review” every three or
four years. The I-CAP stated that, given the rapidly changing situation in Iraq, it would
need a “substantial” review after one year.
280.  Mr Anderson circulated a note on the programme management issues identified
during his 14 to 19 March visit to Iraq to DFID colleagues only on 4 April 2005.159
281.  Mr Anderson highlighted the next 12 months as a critical period for DFID’s Iraq
programme and a “key window for donor impact”. US and UK development spending
was set to reduce after 2006 and the UK military presence, upon which donor activities
in the South relied, might draw down.
282.  Mr Anderson also highlighted two DFID policy papers with implications for DFID’s
programme in Iraq. The first, on fragile states, emphasised the importance of realistic
expectations of host government capacity and of prioritising and sequencing activities
to avoid overwhelming it. The second, on security and development, highlighted the
importance of personal safety and security for the poor, and emphasised that activities
to promote effective security systems were integral to development work. The DFID Iraq
team would meet to consider the implications of the papers in the next few months.
283.  Mr Anderson detailed the work required to bring DFID’s programme for 2005/06
within the new budget. Current commitments exceeded the new budget “by several tens
of millions of pounds”.
157  Report Riley, 5 April 2005, ‘GOC MND(SE) southern Iraq Update – 5 April 2005’.
158  Department for International Development, Iraq: Interim Country Assistance Plan, February 2004.
159  Minute Anderson to DFID [junior official], 4 April 2005, ‘Iraq Programme Management Issues’.
241
Previous page | Contents | Next page