Previous page | Contents | Next page
5  |  Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003
Lord Goldsmith’s advice, 30 January 2003
281.  Ms Adams had written to Sir David Manning on 28 January, recording that Lord
Goldsmith had found Sir Jeremy Greenstock’s letter of 24 January “a useful record of
Sir Jeremy’s arguments on which the Attorney is reflecting”; but that Lord Goldsmith:
“… would like to make clear, in order to avoid any doubt about his position, that
the purpose of the meeting was to allow the Attorney to hear the best arguments
which could be made in support of the view that resolution 1441 can be interpreted
as authorising the use of force, under certain conditions, without a further Council
decision. The Attorney was therefore principally in listening mode …”105
282.  Ms Adams wrote that there was “one point on which Lord Goldsmith would find it
helpful to have further information”. Sir Jeremy’s arguments had relied “heavily on the
negotiating history … and the fact that other delegations sought, but failed to obtain,
certain language in OPs 4 and 12”. Lord Goldsmith wanted to know “if possible, to
what extent other members of the Council were aware of these bilateral discussions
and therefore the significance of the language”. Lord Goldsmith also wished to take up
Sir Jeremy’s suggestion to meet US counterparts, including to “hear their views on what
is necessary in practice to trigger the authorisation to use force”.
283.  Ms Adams concluded that Lord Goldsmith was conscious that Mr Blair was due to
meet President Bush later that week. The letter stated:
“The Prime Minister is aware of the Attorney’s provisional view of the interpretation
of the resolution. However, if the Attorney is to consider the arguments of his US
counterparts before reaching a definitive view, he will not be in a position to finalise
his advice this week. The Attorney would therefore like to know whether you see any
difficulty with this and whether the Prime Minister would wish to have the Attorney’s
considered advice before he departs for the US.”
284.  Sir David Manning wrote on Ms Adams’ letter that someone should respond to
Lord Goldsmith’s question about advice for Mr Blair in his absence.106
285.  Baroness Morgan commented: “not necessary before w/end”.107
286.  Mr Rycroft recorded: “I replied by phone as Sally said.”108
287.  A copy of Ms Adams’ letter was sent to Sir Jeremy Greenstock, who responded
to Lord Goldsmith’s question on 29 January.109
105 Letter Adams to Manning, 28 January 2003, ‘Iraq’.
106 Manuscript comment Manning on Letter Adams to Manning, 28 January 2003, ‘Iraq’.
107 Manuscript comment Morgan on Letter Adams to Manning, 28 January 2003, ‘Iraq’.
108 Manuscript comment Rycroft on Letter Adams to Manning, 28 January 2003, ‘Iraq’.
109 Letter Greenstock to Manning, 29 January 2003, [untitled].
55
Previous page | Contents | Next page