Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
766.  The meeting of the JIC Sub-Committee on Iraq/WMD on 29 March, chaired by
Mr Scarlett, discussed plans for responding to Mr Duelfer’s testimony, including a draft
summary of key points which had been sent to Mr Duelfer.424
767.  The key points included:
“Iraq was remarkably successful in eroding UN sanctions. Containment strategy
was being systematically undermined by several countries including key
members of the UNSC.”
“Iraq derived billions of dollars between 1999 and 2003 from oil smuggling,
kickbacks and abuse of the Oil-for-Food [OFF] programme. This was outside the
control of the UN and free for the regime to spend without restriction.”
“ISG has information regarding dual-use facilities and ongoing research suitable
for a capability to produce CBW at short notice.”
“ISG has also found evidence to indicate Iraqi interest in preserving and
expanding the knowledge needed to design and develop nuclear weapons.”
“In addition … the ISG has continued to uncover very robust programmes for
delivery systems.”
“The ISG is focusing on the broader picture of regime intent and how the
technical developments fit into this picture in an integrated manner.”
The ISG Status Report, 30 March 2004
768.  Mr Blair and President Bush discussed the impact of the ISG Status Report on
30 March.425 Mr Blair said that the draft he had seen was quite good and certainly better
than it might have been. Expectations in the UK were low. The more detail that could be
declassified and put into the text the better. Mr Duelfer’s methodology was better than
Dr Kay’s, which had not been rigorous.
769.  Mr Duelfer delivered his testimony to Congress later on 30 March, explaining:
“This Report is very limited in scope. It is intended to provide a status report of my
efforts at steering the ISG. It is not a preliminary assessment of findings.”426
770.  The Status Report incorporated many of the key points sent to Mr Duelfer
by the UK:
Challenges. Iraqi managers, scientists and engineers were extremely reluctant
to speak freely and documents were not easy to interpret. The ISG still did not
fully understand regime intentions.
424  Minute Scarlett to Howard, 29 March 2004, ‘JIC Sub-Group Meeting on Iraq WMD’ attaching Paper
[unattributed], [undated], ‘ISG Report – Summary of Key Points’.
425  Letter Quarrey to Owen, 30 March 2004, ‘Prime Minister’s VTC with Bush, 30 March: Iraq’.
426  Central Intelligence Agency, 30 March 2004, Testimony by Charles Duelfer on Iraqi WMD Programs.
573
Previous page | Contents | Next page