Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
He stated that “[m]ore widely”, a “succession of speeches, articles and media events”
were needed “to highlight the wider proliferation problem”.
686.  Mr Scarlett commented on Mr Tenet’s “spotlighting” in his speech:
“… particular intelligence from a trusted intelligence partner (ie the UK). The
media of course were watching like hawks for any signs of UK/US splits. Some
had interpreted Tenet’s comments as laying the ground to shift the blame for faulty
intelligence to SIS.”
687.  Mr Scarlett also discussed the debate in Washington and its focus on whether
intelligence had been politicised, and whether the assessments had been wrong. On the
former, there were comments about the highly politicised environment and the extent
to which “very persistent lines of questioning” from politicians might have led analysts
“further towards particular judgements than they would have moved of their own accord”.
688.  Mr Wood, who accompanied Mr Scarlett to the meeting, commented afterwards
that, in the wake of Mr Tenet’s speech, there remained “ample potential for a serious
public CIA/White House blame game between now and the [US presidential] election”.
689.  Mr Blair described his meeting with Mr Duelfer to President Bush during their video
conference on 10 February.382 Mr Blair said that, if there were an ISG interim report
by the end of March, it would define the issue for some time. It therefore needed to be
detailed, with factual backing, and carefully handled. Mr Duelfer had a clear idea of
what was needed, including background on the Iraqi concealment effort, destruction of
documentation, and the compartmentalisation of the WMD programmes.
690.  SIS sent No.10 a copy of a senior officer’s speaking note dated 10 February for an
address to staff on the issue of why no WMD had been found in Iraq.383
691.  Sir Nigel Sheinwald drew Mr Blair’s attention to the note’s conclusion that critics
were unlikely to be proved wrong in the short term, but that the story of Iraq’s WMD
would come out in the end.384
692.  Mr Blair commented on the paper:
“But is Duelfer + ISG now working? That’s what we must press. But this is a
good paper.”385
382  Letter Cannon to Adams, 10 February 2004, ‘Prime Minister’s Video-Conference with President Bush,
10 February’.
383  Paper [senior SIS officer’s speaking note for an address to staff], 10 February 2004, ‘Why have we
found no WMD in Iraq?’
384  Manuscript comment Sheinwald on Paper [senior SIS officer’s speaking note for an address to staff],
10 February 2004, ‘Why have we found no WMD in Iraq?’
385  Manuscript comment Blair on Paper [senior SIS officer’s speaking note for an address to staff],
10 February 2004, ‘Why have we found no WMD in Iraq?’
560
Previous page | Contents | Next page