Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
The decision to establish the Butler Review
631.  In late January, officials advised Mr Blair that there was “a clear risk” that
President Bush would set up an inquiry into Iraq intelligence before he was forced
to do so by Congress.
632.  Sir Nigel Sheinwald discussed the mounting pressure for inquiries in the UK
and the US with Dr Rice on 29 January.348 He recommended that No.10 and the
White House stay “in the closest touch” to ensure public lines were co-ordinated.
633.  Sir Nigel told Mr Straw’s office that the US Administration would prefer to make an
announcement itself rather than be pushed into one by Congress or the media. It was
clear that something was “stirring” in Washington. The announcement of an inquiry there
would make it very difficult to hold the line in the UK.
634.  Mr Powell sent a copy of Sir Nigel’s letter to Mr Blair with the advice:
“You must decide on this with Bush on Tuesday [3 February] before the
[Parliamentary] debate on Wednesday.”349
635.  In a minute to Sir Nigel Sheinwald on 30 January, Mr Scarlett set out his
understanding of developments in the US, including concern about a “Notification to
Congress that one piece of intelligence underpinning” Secretary Powell’s presentation to
the UN on 5 February 2003 “came from an unreliable source”, and that CIA analysts had
missed a “fabrication warning”.350
636.  Mr Scarlett commented:
“This discredited report was sent to SIS but not issued by them so it was not
reflected in our classified assessments or in the dossier. There is one reference in
the dossier (the Executive Summary) to mobile ‘laboratories’. This was a general
term to cover mobile facilities and was not meant to be distinct from ‘production’
units. In terms of any press lines it will be sufficient to say that the discredited report
was not issued by SIS.”
637.  Mr Scarlett added:
“The ground is audibly shifting in Washington. There is a clear risk that the
Administration will set up an Inquiry into the Iraq intelligence. This will take many
months to report and push the whole issue beyond November. It might have the side
effect of prompting an early winding up of the ISG.”
348  Letter Sheinwald to Adams, 30 January 2004, ‘Conversation with US National Security Adviser’.
349  Manuscript comment Powell to PM on Letter Sheinwald to Adams, 30 January 2004, ‘Conversation with
US National Security Adviser’.
350  Minute Scarlett to Sheinwald, 30 January 2004, ‘Iraq WMD: Update from CIA’.
549
Previous page | Contents | Next page