Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
585.  In January, with no timetable for the publication of the next ISG report,
Mr Howard proposed a number of options. He recommended that the best
approach might be to draw a line under the issue of WMD by summer 2004.
586.  On 21 January, after visiting the ISG in Qatar, Baghdad and Basra, Mr Howard
reported “a sense of uncertainty and lack of strategic direction” at the ISG headquarters
in Baghdad: Dr Kay’s successor had not been identified; the timing of future ISG
reports was not known; and there was continuing debate about the extent of the ISG
contribution on counter-terrorism.326 Security remained an issue, but ISG staff morale
seemed high and people were working “incredibly hard”.
587.  Mr Howard assessed that, despite the good work being done, the overall picture
was not fundamentally different to that described in the Interim Report.
588.  On the future of the ISG, Mr Howard suggested that the right option might be to
draw a line under the issue of Iraqi WMD by summer 2004. There was no guarantee that
the new Iraqi Government would be prepared to allow the ISG to continue after it took
office and there was a possibility that the ISG’s final analysis would look like the Interim
Report: clear Iraqi intent to preserve and conceal an ability to reconstitute programmes,
but no operational or current production capability.
589.  Mr Howard identified three options for the next ISG report:
a single, final report around June;
the major substantive report in March or April, with loose ends tied up in June or
July; or
a low-key report focused on context and operating environment in March, with a
substantive report in June.
590.  On 22 January, Mr Scarlett produced a summary of the ISG’s findings and
possible points for Mr Blair to make in public.
591.  Mr Scarlett sent No.10 a paper summarising the “current understanding” of the
ISG’s findings on 22 January.327 The paper had been prepared within the Assessments
Staff, in consultation with Mr Howard, but it had been given a limited distribution. It was
not the result of a full JIC Assessment and had not been considered by a CIG.
592.  The paper summarised what had been found, what remained to be done and
questions raised by the ISG’s work:
326  Letter Howard to Scarlett, 21 January 2004, ‘Iraq WMD: Visit to Iraq Survey Group: 16-19 January’.
327  Minute Scarlett to Rycroft, 22 January 2004, ‘Iraq: WMD’ attaching Paper [unattributed],
22 January 2004, ‘Iraq: WMD’.
540
Previous page | Contents | Next page