Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
The missile designs described were “different to some of those previously
highlighted in intelligence, because they are claimed to be based on Volga
engine technology rather than SCUD”.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
The former Director of the Centre responsible for the UAV programme had
confirmed that an Iraqi UAV flew 500km in June 2002. He continued to state that
they were not designed for the delivery of chemical or biological agent.
Proliferation
“We remain concerned about the proliferation of material, equipment and
technical knowledge from Iraq to third parties … We have not been able to
substantiate intelligence and media reporting of missiles and other related
material being sent to Syria or other countries.”
385.  Addressing why there had been no finds of chemical and biological munitions or
stocks of agent, or Al Hussein missiles or parts, the Assessment stated:
“A number of high value detainees claim that these munitions and systems do not
exist. However, there are serious doubts are [sic] their openness and co-operation.
The weight of intelligence prior to the conflict, and the fact that the investigative
process is at a very early stage, lead us to maintain our previous judgements.
“A number of other explanations have been proposed about the fate of Iraq’s WMD
munitions and systems, some of which are supported by intelligence:
munitions were deployed but have not yet been found, because they were
either destroyed or hidden on the battlefield;
they were destroyed to ensure they were not discovered by UNMOVIC
inspections – […] This would be more extreme than the concealment
measures considered by the JIC in its paper of 11 October 2002 on
inspections. There has also been a suggestion that some munitions were
destroyed just prior to the conflict but intelligence on this has yet to be
verified;
Iraq’s concealment operation was so comprehensive that it did not allow for
rapid reconstitution of an effective CBW or Al Hussein missile capability –
[…] The gap between UN weapons inspectors leaving and the start of the
conflict was only three days.
the political decision-making process in Iraq was paralysed by the
Coalition attack …”
497
Previous page | Contents | Next page