Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
295.  The Liberal Democrat motion was defeated by 301 votes to 203 and the
Government amendment was agreed without a further vote.
296.  Demands for an independent judge-led inquiry persisted through the
summer.
297.  Responding to a question from Mr Kennedy at PMQs on 18 June about whether
the Government had been told by SIS that Iraq did not possess WMD “capable of posing
a direct threat to British security”, Mr Blair stated:
“The intelligence that we put out in the dossier last September described absolutely
accurately the position of the Government … that Saddam was indeed a threat to his
region and the wider world. I always made it clear that the issue was not whether he
was about to launch an immediate strike on Britain: the issue was whether he posed
a threat to his region and to the wider world.”148
298.  Asked by Mr Kennedy whether he thought the issue could be “adequately
investigated by a Foreign Affairs Committee to which he refuses to give evidence and
a Joint Intelligence Committee which he controls”, and whether there could not be “a
proper independent judicial inquiry”, Mr Blair stated that the ISC was “entirely capable of
investigating all the facts and getting to the truth”.
299.  The House of Commons’ second debate on setting up an independent inquiry took
place on 15 July and is described later in this Section.
Dr Blix’s final report to the Security Council
300.  Dr Blix submitted UNMOVIC’s 13th quarterly report to the Security Council
on 30 May.149
301.  In presenting the report to the Council on 5 June, Dr Blix highlighted a number of
points, including:
The Commission had not at any time “found evidence of the continuation or
resumption of programmes of weapons of mass destruction or significant
quantities of proscribed items”, whether from pre-1991 or later.
That did “not necessarily mean that such items could not exist. They might”.
Long lists of items remained “unaccounted for”, but it was “not justified to jump
to the conclusion that something exists just because it is unaccounted for”.
The list of unaccounted for items had “not been shortened by inspections or Iraqi
declarations, explanations or documentation”; and it was Iraq’s task to convince
the inspectors that the items did not exist. Without that, the international
148  House of Commons, Official Report, 18 June 2003, columns 349-350.
149  UN Security Council, ‘Note by Secretary-General’ attaching ‘Thirteenth quarterly report of the Executive
Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in accordance with
paragraph 12 of Security Council resolution 1284 (1999)’ (S/2003/580).
481
Previous page | Contents | Next page