Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.4  |  The search for WMD
On 1 June, Mr Scarlett informed Sir David Manning that a US inter-agency team with
one UK representative continued to assess that the BW trailers “almost certainly” formed
“part of the mobile BW production facilities identified in [pre-invasion] intelligence”.103 The
experts could not think of “any other credible explanation”. That was also “the firm view”
which had been reported on the US Defense Intelligence Agency website.
Mr Scarlett added that a preliminary draft of the team’s report had stated that the trailers,
as presently configured, could not be used as a biological production system. That report
had been withdrawn. Mr Scarlett commented: “It really does seem that it has no status.
Confusing nonetheless.”
Mr Scarlett concluded that there would be a further assessment of Iraq’s BW capabilities,
but a formal assessment could and should be issued only when “we feel confident that we
have enough data”.
Subsequent assessments of the purpose of the trailers are set out later in this Section.
188.  On 15 May, an official in NPD advised Mr Dowse that:
Iraq’s two most senior BW scientists were denying knowledge of recent Iraqi
WMD programmes.
The head of Iraq’s National Monitoring Directorate was claiming that all SCUD
missiles had been destroyed between 1991 and 1993.
There was “considerable frustration” about the absence of UK involvement in
the US interviews of scientists.104
189.  On 16 May, SIS informed the FCO that information emerging from interviews
with individuals prepared to discuss WMD confirmed some of the original
judgements about Iraq’s programmes.
190.  SIS advised that it was not in the Government’s interest to allow media
reports that there was no evidence to justify pre-conflict claims to become
received wisdom.
191.  On 16 May, Sir Richard Dearlove’s Private Secretary sent Mr McDonald an update
on progress and ideas for changing public perceptions of Iraq’s WMD programmes.105
192.  The letter stated that the “poor security situation, apparent disconnect between
parts of the US system (and thus with UK agencies)” and problems flying in and out of
Baghdad were slowing down the effort, but SIS officers in Iraq were “fully switched on to
the task”.
103  Minute Scarlett to Manning, 1 June 2003, ‘BW Trailers’.
104  Minute NPD [junior official] to Dowse, 15 May 2003, ‘Iraq Survey Group: MOD Task Force Meeting,
15 May’.
105  Letter PS/C to McDonald, 16 May 2003, ‘Iraqi WMD’.
463
Previous page | Contents | Next page