Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
be found: Saddam Hussein had “had twelve years to hide the evidence”. Fewer than
a dozen of the 146 suspect sites identified as a priority by the Government had
been visited.74
149.  On third-party validation of findings, Mr Dowse reported that the UK delegation to
the talks:
“… made the point that what constituted credibility was inevitably going to be
subjective – ie what was sufficient for the UK and US Governments might not be
enough for the audiences we really need to convince, including the Security Council
(and UK media). Like it or not, it was hard to escape the fact that a UN seal of
approval would be the most difficult for the critics to dismiss …
“The Americans did not seriously try to argue the point, but I doubt that we entirely
overcame the deep reluctance – particularly in the Pentagon – to contemplate a
further role for UNMOVIC.”
150.  Mr Straw welcomed Mr Dowse’s advice, stating that it highlighted some of his own
key concerns, on which he had already written to Mr Blair.75 Mr Straw asked for a copy to
be sent to Sir David Manning, and for Mr Dowse to prepare a draft minute to Mr Blair.
151.  Mr Straw discussed WMD with Secretary Powell on 24 April.76 UNMOVIC was
rising up the agenda quickly. The US and UK had argued consistently for UNMOVIC,
setting it up in resolution 1284 (1999) and enhancing its role in resolution 1441 (2002).
Mr Straw did not see how they could now argue for it to be set aside. It was important to
keep the moral high ground.
152.  Mr Julian Miller, Chief of the Assessments Staff, sent “lines to take” on Iraq’s WMD,
agreed with NPD, to Mr Simon McDonald, Mr Straw’s Principal Private Secretary.77
On the question: “Iraqi WMD: Where’s the evidence?”, the points made by Mr Miller
included:
Coalition Forces were actively pursuing the issue but the investigation would
not be “a quick process”. Saddam Hussein had had “ample time to conceal his
WMD programmes”.
The process would be “painstaking and detailed: we want to establish the truth
beyond any doubt”.
“Given the emphasis on concealment” it was “hardly surprising that concrete
evidence of WMD” had “yet to come to light”.
74  Minute Dowse to Private Secretary [FCO], 23 April 2003, ‘Iraq WMD: UK/US Talks, 21-22 April’.
75  Minute Owen to Dowse, 28 April 2003, ‘Iraq WMD: UK/US Talks, 21-22 April’.
76  Letter McDonald to Manning, 24 April 2003, ‘Foreign Secretary’s Conversation with US Secretary of
State, 24 April’.
77  Letter Miller to McDonald, 24 April 2003, ‘Iraq and WMD’ attaching Paper Cabinet Office, ‘Iraqi WMD:
Where’s the Evidence?’
454
Previous page | Contents | Next page