Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.3  |  Iraq WMD assessments, October 2002 to March 2003
717.  This might have been prompted by Dr Blix’s report to the Security Council
on 14 February 2003, which demonstrated the developing divergence between the
assessments presented by the US and the UK. Dr Blix’s report of 7 March, which
challenged the view that Iraqi behaviour was preventing UNMOVIC from carrying
out its tasks, should certainly have prompted a review.
718.  Mr Scarlett and Sir David Manning discussed the JIC’s priorities and the need to
retest the standing judgements on 3 January 2003.290 They did not include Iraq’s WMD
programmes and its intentions to use WMD.
719.  Sir David Manning rightly sought advice on the strength of the evidence showing
Saddam Hussein’s possession of WMD, to which Mr Scarlett responded on 17 March.
720.  But as the Butler Report stated, after the JIC’s initial assessment of Iraq’s
declaration on 18 December:
“Thereafter, despite its importance to the determination of whether Iraq was
in further material breach of its disarmament obligations … the JIC made no
further assessment.”291
721.  The Butler Report added:
“The JIC’s attitude will have been shaped by intelligence received in late-November
that Iraq’s declaration would omit references to its prohibited programmes and more
generally would seek to overload the United Nations with information. Predictions on
the extreme length and nature of the declaration were subsequently borne out. Even
so, we find it odd that … the JIC produced no further assessment.”292
722.  Mr Tim Dowse, Head of the FCO Non-Proliferation Department, from January 2001
to November 2003, told the Inquiry:
“… from the end of 2002 … almost up until the invasion, we were getting a fairly
steady stream of quite sort of low level intelligence, operational reports, reports
coming from military sources … about Iraqi concealment activities … which … had
we subjected them to the JIC analytical process might have been regarded as not
very strong. Collectively … every few days getting more of this rather confirmed us
in our view that, if the inspections could be pursued with a little more vigour, a little
more skill, that things were there and could be found.”293
290  Minute Scarlett to Miller, 3 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Questions for the JIC’.
291  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 363.
292  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 364.
293  Public hearing, 25 November 2009, pages 94-95.
417
Previous page | Contents | Next page