Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
FCO Permanent Under Secretary), Ms Eliza Manningham-Buller (Director General of
the Security Service) and Dr David Pepper (Director, GCHQ), as well as to Mr Blair,
there was no mention of any doubts about the reliability of any of the intelligence on
Iraq’s WMD.
545.  Following the evidence to the Hutton Inquiry of Dr Brian Jones (the branch head of
the nuclear, biological and chemical section in the Scientific and Technical Directorate
of the Defence Intelligence Staff, 1987 to January 2003), Sir Richard Dearlove’s Private
Secretary asked for Mr Straw’s permission for Sir Richard to disclose the reports of
11 and 23 September 2002 to the ISC on 8 September 2003.203
546.  The letter stated that Sir Richard Dearlove had told the Committee, during
a hearing on 17 July, that the “reporting came from a new source on trial and was
subsequently withdrawn”.
547.  Mr Straw approved the request the following day.204
THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE’S VIEW
548.  In its Report published in September 2003, the ISC stated that it had considered
the concerns expressed by two individuals in the DIS about “the language used in
the draft dossier, which was not in their view supported by the intelligence available
to them on the current production of chemical and biological agents and weapons”.
The Report stated:
“We were told that there was further intelligence of a nature so sensitive that it
was only released on a very restricted basis. We have seen the intelligence and
understand the basis on which the CDI [Chief of Defence Intelligence] and JIC took
the view they did.”205
549.  The ISC Report did not state that the intelligence had been withdrawn.
THE BUTLER REVIEW
550.  The Butler Report noted that the reporting had been withdrawn in July 2003.
551.  The Butler Report, published on 14 July 2004, stated that SIS had withdrawn the
two reports (of 11 and 23 September 2002) in July 2003, “because the sourcing chain
had by then been discredited”.206 SIS had interviewed the alleged sub-source after the
conflict who had “denied ever having produced the information in the reports”.
203  Letter PS/C to Adams, 8 September 2003, ‘Additional ISC Request for Access to Intelligence’.
204  Letter Straw to C, 9 September 2003, [untitled].
205  Intelligence and Security Committee, Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and
Assessments, September 2003, Cm5972, paragraph 101.
206  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 405.
386
Previous page | Contents | Next page