Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
379.  The JIC Assessment stated:
“The relative weakness of Iraqi forces in the South and the fact that those forces will
face the brunt of a Coalition attack mean southern Iraq is the most likely area for
the first use of CBW against both Coalition Forces and the local population.”145
380.  The Assessment added that one report from August 2002 had indicated:
“… Iraqi plans to use CBW in southern Iraq to cause mass casualties among the
Shia in the event of a US-led attack. The regime would seek to pin the blame for the
resulting high-level of casualties on the Coalition.”
381.  Responding to a series of questions from Mr Blair (see Section 6.2), the MOD
advised on 24 February that Iraq retained “the capability (through a variety of means)
pre-emptively to deliver CBW against Coalition Forces in Kuwait. The question is one of
intent.”146 There was “no intelligence” to indicate that the regime was “currently planning
a pre-emptive strike”. In the MOD view that was “highly unlikely whilst Saddam believes
war can be averted”. If he was convinced that war was “inevitable and imminent” that
“might make a pre-emptive move more attractive” but it was “more likely that Saddam
would deploy CBW after the onset of the campaign”.
382.  In its Assessment, ‘Iraq: Prospects in the North’, of how Iraq would respond in
northern Iraq to a coalition attack, issued on 26 February, the JIC judged:
“The Iraqi regime would be willing to use CBW against the Coalition and
the Kurds.”147
383.  The Assessment made clear that that judgement was a continuation from
earlier Assessments.
384.  In its Note, ‘Saddam’s Plan for Baghdad’ issued on 13 March, the JIC stated that
it had “previously judged that Saddam would be willing to use chemical and biological
warfare (CBW) against the Coalition and the Iraqi population”.148
385.  The JIC assessed that it was “likely that, even if it had not done so already, the
regime would use CBW in the defence of Baghdad if it could”. That “would depend on
the survival of leadership command and control, and of some delivery means, such as
artillery”. Intelligence indicated that the Special Republican Guard and Special Security
Organisation retained “control over CBW munitions” and that the regime had “been
distributing protective CBW clothing and medical supplies for treating exposure to nerve
agents to units around Baghdad”.
145  JIC Assessment, 19 February 2003, ‘Southern Iraq: What’s In Store?’
146  Letter Watkins to Rycroft, 24 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Political and Military Questions’.
147  JIC Assessment, 26 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Prospects in the North’.
148  Note JIC, 13 March 2003, ‘Saddam’s Plan for Baghdad’.
360
Previous page | Contents | Next page